[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v8 07/27] kernel/reboot: Add kernel_can_power_off()
On 5/24/22 16:14, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:33 AM Dmitry Osipenko > <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Add kernel_can_power_off() helper that replaces open-coded checks of >> the global pm_power_off variable. This is a necessary step towards >> supporting chained power-off handlers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 0e2110d2e910e44c > ("kernel/reboot: Add kernel_can_power_off()") in pm/linux-next. > > This causes the "poweroff" command (Debian nfsroot) to no longer > cleanly halt the system on arm32 systems, but fail with a panic > instead: > > -reboot: System halted > +reboot: Power down > +Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x00000000 > +CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd-shutdow Not tainted > 5.18.0-rc7-shmobile-00007-g0e2110d2e910 #1274 > +Hardware name: Generic R-Car Gen2 (Flattened Device Tree) > + unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 > + show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x4c > + dump_stack_lvl from panic+0xf4/0x330 > + panic from do_exit+0x1c8/0x8e4 > + do_exit from __do_sys_reboot+0x174/0x1fc > + __do_sys_reboot from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54 > +Exception stack(0xf0815fa8 to 0xf0815ff0) > +5fa0: 004e6954 00000000 fee1dead 28121969 4321fedc f0d94600 > +5fc0: 004e6954 00000000 00000000 00000058 befa0c78 00000000 befa0c10 004e56f8 > +5fe0: 00000058 befa0b6c b6ec8d45 b6e4a746 > +---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > exitcode=0x00000000 ]--- > > On arm64, "poweroff" causes a clean "reboot: Power down" before/after. > > On both arm32 and arm64, the same handlers are registered: > - SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF_PREPARE: legacy_pm_power_off_prepare > - SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF: legacy_pm_power_off > > On both arm32 and arm64, legacy_pm_power_off_prepare() is called. > On both arm32 and arm64, legacy_pm_power_off() does not seem to > be called. > > On arm32, both pm_power_off_prepare and pm_power_off are NULL. > On arm64, pm_power_off_prepare is NULL, and > pm_power_off is psci_sys_poweroff. > > Do you have a clue? > Thanks! Thank you, Geert! I see the problem, the kernel_can_power_off() checks whether power-off handler is registered, but it's always registered because legacy_pm_power_off is registered unconditionally. So it causes trouble for platforms that don't have power-off handler installed at all. All platforms that I tested have a power-off handler, so now wonder that I didn't notice this before. This change should fix the problem, please give it a try: --- 8< --- diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c index 0bdc64ecf4f6..2d55b8bdb444 100644 --- a/kernel/reboot.c +++ b/kernel/reboot.c @@ -569,22 +569,6 @@ static int legacy_pm_power_off(struct sys_off_data *data) return NOTIFY_DONE; } -/* - * Register sys-off handlers for legacy PM callbacks. This allows legacy - * PM callbacks co-exist with the new sys-off API. - * - * TODO: Remove legacy handlers once all legacy PM users will be switched - * to the sys-off based APIs. - */ -static int __init legacy_pm_init(void) -{ - register_sys_off_handler(SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF, SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT, - legacy_pm_power_off, NULL); - - return 0; -} -core_initcall(legacy_pm_init); - static void do_kernel_power_off_prepare(void) { blocking_notifier_call_chain(&power_off_prep_handler_list, 0, NULL); @@ -670,6 +654,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd, if (ret) return ret; + /* + * Register sys-off handler for the legacy PM callback. This allows + * legacy PM callbacks co-exist with the new sys-off API. + * + * TODO: Remove legacy handler once all legacy PM users will be + * switched to the sys-off based APIs. + */ + if (pm_power_off) + register_sys_off_handler(SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF, + SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT, + legacy_pm_power_off, NULL); + /* Instead of trying to make the power_off code look like * halt when pm_power_off is not set do it the easy way. */ -- Best regards, Dmitry
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |