Re: [PATCH RFC v1 4/7] swiotlb: to implement io_tlb_high_mem

[Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Christoph,

On 6/8/22 10:05 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> All this really needs to be hidden under the hood.
> 

Since this patch file has 200+ lines, would you please help clarify what does
'this' indicate?

The idea of this patch:

1. Convert the functions to initialize swiotlb into callee. The callee accepts
'true' or 'false' as arguments to indicate whether it is for default or new
swiotlb buffer, e.g., swiotlb_init_remap() into __swiotlb_init_remap().

2. At the caller side to decide if we are going to call the callee to create the
extra buffer.

Do you mean the callee if still *too high level* and all the
decision/allocation/initialization should be down at *lower level functions*?

E.g., if I re-work the "struct io_tlb_mem" to make the 64-bit buffer as the 2nd
array of io_tlb_mem->slots[32_or_64][index], the user will only notice it is the
default 'io_tlb_default_mem', but will not be able to know if it is allocated
from 32-bit or 64-bit buffer.

Thank you very much for the feedback.

Dongli Zhang