[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] xen/evtchn: Add design for static event channel signaling
On Fri, 13 May 2022, Rahul Singh wrote: > This patch introduces a new feature to support the signaling between > two domains in dom0less system. > > Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx> > --- > v3 changes: > - add dt node example for dom0 and domU. > - add info about "xen,enhanced" property to enable the event-channel interface > for domU guests. > > v2 changes: > - switch to the one-subnode-per-evtchn under xen,domain" compatible node. > - Add more detail about event-channel. > --- > docs/designs/dom0less-evtchn.md | 144 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 144 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 docs/designs/dom0less-evtchn.md > > diff --git a/docs/designs/dom0less-evtchn.md b/docs/designs/dom0less-evtchn.md > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..3c89a9fb7d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/docs/designs/dom0less-evtchn.md > @@ -0,0 +1,144 @@ > +# Signaling support between two domUs on dom0less system > + > +## Current state: Draft version > + > +## Proposer(s): Rahul Singh, Bertrand Marquis > + > +## Problem Statement: > + > +Dom0less guests would benefit from a statically-defined memory sharing and > +signally system for communication. One that would be immediately available at > +boot without any need for dynamic configurations. > + > +In embedded a great variety of guest operating system kernels exist, many of > +which don't have support for xenstore, grant table, or other complex drivers. > +Some of them are small kernel-space applications (often called "baremetal", > +not to be confused with the term "baremetal" used in the data center which > +means "without hypervisors") or RTOSes. Additionally, for safety reasons, > users > +often need to be able to configure the full system statically so that it can > +be verified statically. > + > +Event channels are very simple and can be added even to baremetal > applications. > +This proposal introduces a way to define them statically to make them > suitable > +for dom0less embedded deployments. > + > +## Proposal: > + > +Event channels are the basic primitive provided by Xen for event > notifications. > +An event channel is a logical connection between 2 domains (more specifically > +between dom1,port1, and dom2,port2). Each event has a pending and a masked > bit. > +The pending bit indicates the event has been raised. The masked bit is used > by > +the domain to prevent the delivery of that specific event. Xen only performs > a > +0 -> 1 transition on the pending bits and does not touch the mask bit. The > +domain may toggle masked bits in the masked bit field and should clear the > +pending bit when an event has been processed > + > +Events are received by a domain via an interrupt from Xen to the domain, > +indicating when an event arrives (setting the bit). Further notifications are > +blocked until the bit is cleared again. Events are delivered asynchronously > to > +a domain and are enqueued when the domain is not running. Xen supports two > +different ABIs for event channel: FIFO and 2L. > + > +The event channel communication will be established statically between two > +domains (dom0 and domU also) before unpausing the domains after domain > creation. > +Event channel connection information between domains will be passed to Xen > via > +the device tree node. The event channel will be created and established > +in Xen before the domain started. The domain doesn’t need to do any operation > +to establish a connection. Domain only needs hypercall > +EVTCHNOP_send(local port) to send notifications to the remote guest. > + > +There is no need to describe the static event channel info in the domU device > +tree. Static event channels are only useful in fully static configurations, > +and in those configurations the domU device tree dynamically generated by Xen > +is not needed. > + > +To enable the event-channel interface for domU guests include the > +"xen,enhanced" property with an empty string ( or with the value > +"enabled” or "evtchn") in domU Xen device tree node. > + > +Under the "xen,domain" compatible node, there need to be sub-nodes with > +compatible "xen,evtchn" that describe the event channel connection between > two > +domains(dom0 and domU also). > + > +The event channel sub-node has the following properties: > + > +- compatible > + > + "xen,evtchn" > + > +- xen,evtchn > + > + The property is tuples of two numbers > + (local-evtchn link-to-foreign-evtchn) where: > + > + local-evtchn is an integer value that will be used to allocate local port > + for a domain to send and receive event notifications to/from the remote > + domain. Maximum supported value is 2^17 for FIFO ABI and 4096 for 2L ABI. > + > + link-to-foreign-evtchn is a single phandle to a foreign evtchn to which > + local-evtchn will be connected. > + > + > +Example: > + > + chosen { > + .... > + > + module@0 { > + compatible = "multiboot,kernel", "multiboot,module"; > + xen,uefi-binary = "..."; > + bootargs = "..."; > + > + /* one sub-node per local event channel */ > + ec1: evtchn@1 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + /* local-evtchn link-to-foreign-evtchn */ > + xen,evtchn = <0xa &ec2>; > + }; > + }; Great that you added a dom0 example. I wish we had a dom0 node for dom0 but what you have done here is the easiest thing we can do and less disruptive for the existing bindings. Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > + domU1: domU1 { > + compatible = "xen,domain"; > + > + /* one sub-node per local event channel */ > + ec2: evtchn@2 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + /* local-evtchn link-to-foreign-evtchn */ > + xen,evtchn = <0xa &ec1>; > + }; > + > + ec3: evtchn@3 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + xen,evtchn = <0xb &ec5>; > + }; > + > + ec4: evtchn@4 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + xen,evtchn = <0xc &ec6>; > + }; > + .... > + }; > + > + domU2: domU2 { > + compatible = "xen,domain"; > + > + /* one sub-node per local event channel */ > + ec5: evtchn@5 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + /* local-evtchn link-to-foreign-evtchn */ > + xen,evtchn = <0xa &ec3>; > + }; > + > + ec6: evtchn@6 { > + compatible = "xen,evtchn-v1"; > + xen,evtchn = <0xb &ec4>; > + }; > + .... > + }; > + }; > + > +In above example three event channel comunications will be established: > + > + dom0 (port 0xa) <-----------------> domU1 (port 0xa) > + domU1 (port 0xb) <-----------------> domU2 (port 0xa) > + domU1 (port 0xc) <-----------------> domU2 (port 0xb) > -- > 2.25.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |