Re: [PATCH] x86/PAT: Report PAT on CPUs that support PAT without MTRR

[Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:20:37PM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:
> The commit 99c13b8c8896d7bcb92753bf
> ("x86/mm/pat: Don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it")
> incorrectly failed to account for the case in init_cache_modes() when
> CPUs do support PAT and falsely reported PAT to be disabled when in
> fact PAT is enabled. In some environments, notably in Xen PV domains,
> MTRR is disabled but PAT is still enabled, and that is the case
> that the aforementioned commit failed to account for.
> 
> As an unfortunate consequnce, the pat_enabled() function currently does
> not correctly report that PAT is enabled in such environments. The fix
> is implemented in init_cache_modes() by setting pat_bp_enabled to true
> in init_cache_modes() for the case that commit 99c13b8c8896d7bcb92753bf
> ("x86/mm/pat: Don't report PAT on CPUs that don't support it") failed
> to account for.
> 
> This patch fixes a regression that some users are experiencing with
> Linux as a Xen Dom0 driving particular Intel graphics devices by
> correctly reporting to the Intel i915 driver that PAT is enabled where
> previously it was falsely reporting that PAT is disabled.
> 
> Fixes: 99c13b8c8896d7bcb92753bf ("x86/mm/pat: Don't report PAT on CPUs that 
> don't support it")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Reminder: This patch is a regression fix that is needed on stable
> versions 5.17 and later.

Then why are you saying it fixes a commit that is in 4.4.y and newer?

confused,

greg k-h