[PATCH v2 1/3] xen/cpu: Fix MISRA C 2012 Rule 20.7 violation

[Xenia Ragiadakou <burzalodowa@xxxxxxxxx>]

In MASK_DECLARE_ macros, the macro parameter 'x' is used as expression and
therefore it is good to be enclosed in parentheses to prevent against
unintended expansions.

Signed-off-by: Xenia Ragiadakou <burzalodowa@xxxxxxxxx>
---

Changes in v2:
- fix MISRA C 2012 Rule 20.7 violation in all MASK_DECLARE_ macros

 xen/common/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/common/cpu.c b/xen/common/cpu.c
index b0b63cdb36..feb2a6634e 100644
--- a/xen/common/cpu.c
+++ b/xen/common/cpu.c
@@ -25,10 +25,10 @@ const cpumask_t cpumask_all = {
  */
 
 /* cpu_bit_bitmap[0] is empty - so we can back into it */
-#define MASK_DECLARE_1(x) [x+1][0] = 1UL << (x)
-#define MASK_DECLARE_2(x) MASK_DECLARE_1(x), MASK_DECLARE_1(x+1)
-#define MASK_DECLARE_4(x) MASK_DECLARE_2(x), MASK_DECLARE_2(x+2)
-#define MASK_DECLARE_8(x) MASK_DECLARE_4(x), MASK_DECLARE_4(x+4)
+#define MASK_DECLARE_1(x) [(x)+1][0] = 1UL << (x)
+#define MASK_DECLARE_2(x) MASK_DECLARE_1(x), MASK_DECLARE_1((x)+1)
+#define MASK_DECLARE_4(x) MASK_DECLARE_2(x), MASK_DECLARE_2((x)+2)
+#define MASK_DECLARE_8(x) MASK_DECLARE_4(x), MASK_DECLARE_4((x)+4)
 
 const unsigned long cpu_bit_bitmap[BITS_PER_LONG+1][BITS_TO_LONGS(NR_CPUS)] = {
 
-- 
2.34.1