Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: make pat and mtrr independent from each other

[Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/14/2022 9:01 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> The To: line had your address in it, so it was sent to you, and again,
> it was not encrypted as you claimed, but rather just signed to verify he
> was the sender.  That's not making anything difficult for anyone, so I
> think you owe him an apology here, especially as you are asking him to
> do work for you.

You misunderstand me completely. I am not here to ask Juergen to do any
work for me, he is the one who volunteered to fix a regression that affects
my computer, so I am interested in what he has to say, and I am on this mailing
list to find out if he, and other Linux developers and maintainers, are the kind
of people I want to have writing the software that runs on my computers.
I don't have to tell you what my decision about that is, but do you really think
I want people who refuse to answer my questions about the software they
are writing for my computers to continue to be the ones I rely on for the
security and stability of my computer systems? If you think I am that stupid,
I suppose you also think I am too stupid to receive an e-mail message that
Juergen tried to send me earlier today. The fact is, Juergen is the only
person I am aware of who has tried and failed to get an e-mail message
delivered to me during the past thirty years since I started using e-mail.
That's quite an accomplishment for Juergen to achieve!

Best regards,

Chuck