[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 3/4] xen: move XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG to generic config
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 1:32 PM Oleksandr Tyshchenko <Oleksandr_Tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10.08.22 08:07, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > Hello Lukas, all > > > While reviewing arch/x86/configs/xen.config, I noticed the following > > note in this file: > > > > '# depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG, arm64 doesn't enable this yet, > > '# move to generic config if it ever does. > > CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y > > > > Commit 6c6685055a28 ("kconfig: add xenconfig defconfig helper") in June > > 2015 adds this note. Fortunately, commit 4ab215061554 ("arm64: Add memory > > hotplug support") from December 2018 adds the memory hotplug in arm64, so > > the precondition of this note above is now met. > > > > Move setting the config XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG into the generic > > xen.config now. > > > I might have missed something but I have never heard of anyone using > XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG on Arm. > > Looking into the code, I am afraid, CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON_MEMORY_HOTPLUG > won't be functional on Arm without reworking resource allocation logic > in drivers/xen/ballon.c at least, since system "iomem_resource" cannot > be used on Arm to allocate unused memory region(s), please see > additional_memory_resource(). I might be wrong, but it feels to me that > here we would need a similar logic like in > drivers/xen/unpopulated-alloc.c which is functional on Arm since it uses > specific Xen resource (on x86 it is just an iomem_resource, but on Arm > it contains provided by the hypervisor extended regions). > > I am not aware of anyone working on it, so I wouldn't enable that > support on Arm by default until the code is updated. > Thanks for the in-depth investigation and explanation. For now, let us drop this patch here and keep the configs as they are. Lukas
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |