|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH v2] core-parking: fix build with gcc12 and NR_CPUS=1
Gcc12 takes issue with core_parking_remove()'s
for ( ; i < cur_idle_nums; ++i )
core_parking_cpunum[i] = core_parking_cpunum[i + 1];
complaining that the right hand side array access is past the bounds of
1. Clearly the compiler can't know that cur_idle_nums can only ever be
zero in this case (as the sole CPU cannot be parked).
Arrange for core_parking.c's contents to not be needed altogether, and
then disable its building when NR_CPUS == 1.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Disable building of core_parking.c altogether.
--- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ config X86
select ALTERNATIVE_CALL
select ARCH_MAP_DOMAIN_PAGE
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128
- select CORE_PARKING
+ select CORE_PARKING if NR_CPUS > 1
select HAS_ALTERNATIVE
select HAS_COMPAT
select HAS_CPUFREQ
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
@@ -727,12 +727,17 @@ ret_t do_platform_op(
case XEN_CORE_PARKING_SET:
idle_nums = min_t(uint32_t,
op->u.core_parking.idle_nums, num_present_cpus() - 1);
- ret = continue_hypercall_on_cpu(
- 0, core_parking_helper, (void *)(unsigned long)idle_nums);
+ if ( CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1 )
+ ret = continue_hypercall_on_cpu(
+ 0, core_parking_helper,
+ (void *)(unsigned long)idle_nums);
+ else if ( idle_nums )
+ ret = -EINVAL;
break;
case XEN_CORE_PARKING_GET:
- op->u.core_parking.idle_nums = get_cur_idle_nums();
+ op->u.core_parking.idle_nums = CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 1
+ ? get_cur_idle_nums() : 0;
ret = __copy_field_to_guest(u_xenpf_op, op, u.core_parking) ?
-EFAULT : 0;
break;
--- a/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ long arch_do_sysctl(
long (*fn)(void *);
void *hcpu;
- switch ( op )
+ switch ( op | -(CONFIG_NR_CPUS == 1) )
{
case XEN_SYSCTL_CPU_HOTPLUG_ONLINE:
plug = true;
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |