[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 06:42:51 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=u2mba0glZgU5sUG/ICggwLbmifDW1N4nzwqKJFMYVm8=; b=NcPNIUaaZwLpkPqd1uVYcpitY1Jmf1acDuk2XZ9unzGXJd2M9+la7f9XHJmCFsNXl6LtcrYKbE2N0wwHIw/XLV1sH39N3Idzx3qtzK0fa37RYqrx8A1A8Z3yUN8kAKxrYstAf+D4YEt4U4jJanGZvjiEJ0cwd3GYo30KRgAAqEE9yL9nsrl9FdG1O15Y/A9sZVFiWMR10CDOy5BASGZnNcu2RMN59Mohq024C+wzhI4Og4PNhen+jhADCabDZiMn5DtNLbrc346q4wU0WMwgCuDkTwviAcJ+fBIA7bg/q2SOlD4WgoYeG1rBrH///lG4kI6UQkEz7PPkE5ssQRUY4A==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=u2mba0glZgU5sUG/ICggwLbmifDW1N4nzwqKJFMYVm8=; b=cGDqrWS+xp3y45pf5l+jZ/OGw+/yORf3ADEHzXUNEjrd5Sup8OQfqHRirW7bIKKIpJNqOXc5hrr2HrKIoMaJHjjGPbXQIFsXxFBBgQrIPxl0UHMK1NEt2PJaHjvejV2GvM0+/WuDCcoQQspvdDxZQrJr5vD8Om7bWtJ7KtKzJBK0CWSn0ygY4Rqh2iqAmbjPhTySvrsJs9QdB4nzdpijPauNm5Pqpgq8gwqxbkm3Cos9pZgWK8ZPXgE+hdvyg+4Y9upfH2Ut8R/RrslO5rigqjF3BowlRO2WaRW469iztwhntJspr8RWUFj6jNAoqAJXXlTIDTAdvDUN66uTLfBF1A==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=je7qzIBJhIj1eGq8s5L4SiCRcJvlFVl//VLcUP5ho6RjVh5v+K3ypWoTaJRbJ90iRv9EnUXV4mVZ3n8BMQLhYRMzG8kxc8DlIPGaX6aawzN4C8YXmIXR/UnxCUz96EZzVaXpe90SbYeerrrjyRupNvZo7FjftkcEBNbSM4GddPJpZyV1jkvYXAF+egKrKLdFqCkoY26QKA8FGI7VYgnOhTxXCatKxxybvvb6ztWhv9XCURc21VNKCXzj76uZh4Zxpba6ZGE+ODe4tyhlh+kF5jRrv2KOgrwgdgpO+Veq3JGOfWUcsHXjCsjQBI6PMmleZW0prMtY/ptQGP1HdptcNg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=FfC3OK3OGPT/ZO5Uhaw8km840dPMKaFkgAl3Mcxxar2L/B8sb4Z7jOyrTBhjRhYpmh6wjFylITE6ARFfT75rzPhXFMQVEGBXhUQhbametOEjlc4UGZJrz1O/Q9xWRoQ/wywBRy6l26BI4j86KjA0Cmz1FKblqUYgjzCA79gKty/zxbmqo3ZSi0uch1iY/q5+iCt3++AK2TDJ67+lfF27AOET/6yRIj59S5B35vdGVsTWz8bCqvVWbih3fmtvjmG4Olwls11c60Xo+D1R2vGkp/rVwLft7yHMJ01kI1IXn3asuuAcSF/xdUrmIPVNVUPg8qackUIjR0qySfQDegu6QQ==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 06:43:14 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHY3dQtFH1xMEjYXEqV6So1jL4Dp64KChlggABBzQCAAANfQA==
- Thread-topic: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
>
> On 12.10.2022 04:42, Henry Wang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> Subject: [xen-4.15-testing test] 173498: regressions - FAIL
> >>
> >> flight 173498 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
> >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/173498/
> >>
> >> Regressions :-(
> >
> > I think these regressions are from the backporting happened yesterday,
> > see below...
> >
> >>
> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> including tests which could not be run:
> >> build-arm64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >> 172547
> >> build-arm64-xsm 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >> 172547
> >> build-amd64 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >> 172547
> >> build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> >> 172547
> >
> > ...The arm/arm64 regression is from the backporting of commit:
> > xen/arm, libxl: Implement XEN_DOMCTL_shadow_op for Arm
> >
> > The issue is:
> > In 4.16, commit
> > 2107cc76db3a libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()
> > changes the prototype of xc_shadow_control(), and hence the calling of
> > xc_shadow_control() in 4.13, 4.14 and 4.15 does not match the calling of
> > xc_shadow_control() in 4.16 and after.
>
> So did I commit a wrong patch, or were the patches for the older branches
> wrong already in xsa.git?
I think the latter. For this commit I think the patch for master branch was
picked
for the 4.13-4.15 backporting, without noticing the xc_shadow_control()
prototype change in 4.16.
I can send a fix for this. If we don't want to backport the
"libxc: split xc_logdirty_control() from xc_shadow_control()"
Kind regards,
Henry
|
