[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: simplify sysenter and syscall setup



On 21.10.22 10:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 20/10/2022 12:39, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 01:36:19PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
xen_enable_sysenter() and xen_enable_syscall() can be simplified a lot.

Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
index cfa99e8f054b..0f33ed6d3a7b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
@@ -910,17 +910,9 @@ static int register_callback(unsigned type, const void 
*func)
void xen_enable_sysenter(void)
  {
-       int ret;
-       unsigned sysenter_feature;
-
-       sysenter_feature = X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32;
-
-       if (!boot_cpu_has(sysenter_feature))
-               return;
-
-       ret = register_callback(CALLBACKTYPE_sysenter, 
xen_entry_SYSENTER_compat);
-       if(ret != 0)
-               setup_clear_cpu_cap(sysenter_feature);
+       if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SYSENTER32) &&
Can you switch that and below to cpu_feature_enabled() while at it, pls?

Why?

This function (should) be called on the BSP only (because Xen's API lets
this be specified when starting APs).

No, this is true for the syscall callback only. the sysenter and the syscall32
callbacks can only be set via Xen tools or on the local cpu by registering.


Whether it's once, or one per cpu, it doesn't matter.

It does.


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.