[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 11/12] Arm: GICv3: Define macros to read/write 64 bit



Hi Ayan,

On 21/10/2022 16:31, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
Defined readq_relaxed()/writeq_relaxed() to read and write 64 bit regs.
This in turn calls readl_relaxed()/writel_relaxed() twice for the lower
and upper 32 bits.

This needs an explanation why we can't use "strd/ldrd". And the same would have to be duplicated in the code below.


Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayankuma@xxxxxxx>
---
  xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm32/io.h | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm32/io.h 
b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm32/io.h
index 73a879e9fb..6a5f563fbc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm32/io.h
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/arm32/io.h
@@ -80,10 +80,14 @@ static inline u32 __raw_readl(const volatile void __iomem 
*addr)
                                          __raw_readw(c)); __r; })
  #define readl_relaxed(c) ({ u32 __r = le32_to_cpu((__force __le32) \
                                          __raw_readl(c)); __r; })
+#define readq_relaxed(c) ({ u64 __r = (le64_to_cpu(readl_relaxed(c+4)) << 32) 
| \
+                                        readl_relaxed(c); __r; })

All the read*_relaxed are provide atomic read. This is not guaranteed by your new helper. The name should be different (maybe readq_relaxed_non_atomic()) to make clear of the difference.

I also don't quite understand the implementation. The value returned by readl_relaxed() is already in the CPU endianess. So why do you call le64_to_cpu() on top?

#define writeb_relaxed(v,c) __raw_writeb(v,c)
  #define writew_relaxed(v,c)     __raw_writew((__force u16) cpu_to_le16(v),c)
  #define writel_relaxed(v,c)     __raw_writel((__force u32) cpu_to_le32(v),c)
+#define writeq_relaxed(v,c)     writel_relaxed(((uint64_t)v&0xffffffff), c); \
+                                    writel_relaxed((((uint64_t)v)>>32), (c+4));

This needs to be surrounded with do { } while (0), otherwise the following would not properly work:

if ( foo )
  writeq_relaxed(v, c);

Similarly, if 'v' is a call, then it will end up to be called twice.

#define readb(c) ({ u8 __v = readb_relaxed(c); __iormb(); __v; })
  #define readw(c)                ({ u16 __v = readw_relaxed(c); __iormb(); 
__v; })

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.