[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools/tests: Unit test for p2m pool size
On 26/10/2022 15:24, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 26.10.2022 12:20, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/tests/p2m-pool/Makefile >> @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ >> +XEN_ROOT = $(CURDIR)/../../.. >> +include $(XEN_ROOT)/tools/Rules.mk >> + >> +TARGET := test-p2m-pool >> + >> +.PHONY: all >> +all: $(TARGET) >> + >> +.PHONY: clean >> +clean: >> + $(RM) -- *.o $(TARGET) $(DEPS_RM) >> + >> +.PHONY: distclean >> +distclean: clean >> + $(RM) -- *~ >> + >> +.PHONY: install >> +install: all >> + $(INSTALL_DIR) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN) >> + $(INSTALL_PROG) $(TARGET) $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN) >> + >> +.PHONY: uninstall >> +uninstall: >> + $(RM) -- $(DESTDIR)$(LIBEXEC_BIN)/$(TARGET) >> + >> +CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_xeninclude) >> +CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_libxenctrl) >> +CFLAGS += $(CFLAGS_libxenforeginmemory) > Typo here or typo also elsewhere: CFLAGS_libxenforeignmemory? I > have to admit that I can't really spot where these variables are > populated. The place in Rules.mk that I could spot uses > > CFLAGS_libxen$(1) = $$(CFLAGS_xeninclude) > > i.e. the expansion doesn't really depend on the library. Hmm. It was copy&paste from test-resource and I forgot to trim foreignmemory, but I guess I'll need to go and fix the typo everywhere. > > Apart from this looks okay to me, maybe apart from ... > >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tools/tests/p2m-pool/test-p2m-pool.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ >> +#include <err.h> >> +#include <errno.h> >> +#include <inttypes.h> >> +#include <stdio.h> >> +#include <string.h> >> +#include <sys/mman.h> >> + >> +#include <xenctrl.h> >> +#include <xenforeignmemory.h> >> +#include <xengnttab.h> >> +#include <xen-tools/libs.h> >> + >> +static unsigned int nr_failures; >> +#define fail(fmt, ...) \ >> +({ \ >> + nr_failures++; \ >> + (void)printf(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ >> +}) >> + >> +static xc_interface *xch; >> +static uint32_t domid; >> + >> +static struct xen_domctl_createdomain create = { >> + .flags = XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hvm | XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hap, >> + .max_vcpus = 1, >> + .max_grant_frames = 1, >> + .grant_opts = XEN_DOMCTL_GRANT_version(1), >> + >> + .arch = { >> +#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) >> + .emulation_flags = XEN_X86_EMU_LAPIC, >> +#endif >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +static uint64_t default_p2m_size_bytes = >> +#if defined(__x86_64__) || defined(__i386__) >> + 256 << 12; /* Only x86 HAP for now. x86 Shadow broken. */ > ... this shadow related comment (the commit message could at least > say what's wrong there, to give a hint at what would need fixing to > remove this restriction) and ... That was in reference to the PV issue. Will follow it up on patch 1 where there's more context. > >> +#elif defined (__arm__) || defined(__aarch64__) >> + 16 << 12; >> +#endif >> + >> +static void run_tests(void) >> +{ >> + xen_pfn_t physmap[] = { 0 }; >> + uint64_t size_bytes, old_size_bytes; >> + int rc; >> + >> + printf("Test default p2m mempool size\n"); >> + >> + rc = xc_get_p2m_mempool_size(xch, domid, &size_bytes); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: get p2m mempool size: %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + printf("P2M pool size %"PRIu64" bytes (%"PRIu64"kB, %"PRIu64"MB)\n", >> + size_bytes, size_bytes >> 10, size_bytes >> 20); >> + >> + >> + /* >> + * Check that the domain has the expected default allocation size. This >> + * will fail if the logic in Xen is altered without an equivelent >> + * adjustment here. >> + */ >> + if ( size_bytes != default_p2m_size_bytes ) >> + return fail(" Fail: size %"PRIu64" != expected size %"PRIu64"\n", >> + size_bytes, default_p2m_size_bytes); >> + >> + >> + printf("Test that allocate doesn't alter pool size\n"); >> + >> + /* >> + * Populate the domain with some RAM. This will cause more of the p2m >> + * pool to be used. >> + */ >> + old_size_bytes = size_bytes; >> + >> + rc = xc_domain_setmaxmem(xch, domid, -1); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: setmaxmem: : %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + rc = xc_domain_populate_physmap_exact(xch, domid, 1, 0, 0, physmap); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: populate physmap: %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + /* >> + * Re-get the p2m size. Should not have changed as a consequence of >> + * populate physmap. >> + */ >> + rc = xc_get_p2m_mempool_size(xch, domid, &size_bytes); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: get p2m mempool size: %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + if ( old_size_bytes != size_bytes ) >> + return fail(" Fail: p2m mempool size changed %"PRIu64" => >> %"PRIu64"\n", >> + old_size_bytes, size_bytes); >> + >> + >> + >> + printf("Test bad set size\n"); >> + >> + /* >> + * Check that setting a non-page size results in failure. >> + */ >> + rc = xc_set_p2m_mempool_size(xch, domid, size_bytes + 1); >> + if ( rc != -1 || errno != EINVAL ) >> + return fail(" Fail: Bad set size: expected -1/EINVAL, got %d/%d - >> %s\n", >> + rc, errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + >> + printf("Test very large set size\n"); >> + >> + /* >> + * Check that setting a large P2M size succeeds. This is expecting to >> + * trigger continuations. >> + */ >> + rc = xc_set_p2m_mempool_size(xch, domid, 64 << 20); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: Set size 64MB: %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + >> + /* >> + * Check that the reported size matches what set consumed. >> + */ >> + rc = xc_get_p2m_mempool_size(xch, domid, &size_bytes); >> + if ( rc ) >> + return fail(" Fail: get p2m mempool size: %d - %s\n", >> + errno, strerror(errno)); >> + >> + if ( size_bytes != 64 << 20 ) >> + return fail(" Fail: expected mempool size %u, got %"PRIu64"\n", >> + 64 << 20, size_bytes); >> +} >> + >> +int main(int argc, char **argv) >> +{ >> + int rc; >> + >> + printf("P2M Shadow memory pool tests\n"); > ... the question of why "Shadow" here. Hmm, stale, but even the name of this test (p2m-pool) is subject to a resolution of the naming question on patch 1. ~Andrew
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |