[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] Arm/P2M: reduce locking in p2m_{alloc,free}_page()
Hi Jan, On 29/11/2022 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote: It is generally preferable to not hold locks around allocation functions. And indeed in the hwdom case there's no point at all to hold the paging lock. Reduce the locked regions to the non-hwdom case, while at the same time arranging for p2m_alloc_page() to have just a single return point. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ static struct page_info *p2m_alloc_page( { struct page_info *pg;- spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock);/* * For hardware domain, there should be no limit in the number of pages that * can be allocated, so that the kernel may take advantage of the extended @@ -58,34 +57,28 @@ static struct page_info *p2m_alloc_page( { pg = alloc_domheap_page(NULL, 0); if ( pg == NULL ) - { printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "Failed to allocate P2M pages for hwdom.\n"); - spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock); - return NULL; - } } else { + spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock); pg = page_list_remove_head(&d->arch.paging.p2m_freelist); - if ( unlikely(!pg) ) - { - spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock); - return NULL; - } + spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock); } - spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock);return pg;}static void p2m_free_page(struct domain *d, struct page_info *pg){ - spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock); if ( is_hardware_domain(d) ) free_domheap_page(pg); else + { + spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock); page_list_add_tail(pg, &d->arch.paging.p2m_freelist); - spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock); + spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock); + } }/* Return the size of the pool, in bytes. */ -- Julien Grall
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |