Xen project Mailing List

Re: [xen-unstable test] 175154: regressions - FAIL

Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:07:37 +0100

Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none

Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=2LmO4llM2TAx3cUmlwvYPFi4Vz76nFvmBmxk5BMFWRE=; b=TIEQpjZiZdr90II3k7iTYxrAP1/H3MpA0ZPviwRSCodAohvxMAJ85pjW2/RxFZE2HZIeI1+KLPES0FNhvAWgHGZ3taqcsHr5UNQh3m0qDgwgMnSx6qLTaRVn4wnFdMsOdR4YjJnK7vjSLaEfH5G/GLD+tKEWrO/HELUR5zZy26wCX1798ijUoEPNgIN2ch+59aVEgMgfWAlmNSDqR5EX6xQF9iGPPXgmPuAAMNrY/Hg7a3Kp1/gRhD/+928D5lEMYFbBtQGjmtPA09fKmXWH0poDcMNkrGzxy5P1q6e2m5keplTjxiyPuJ8aOx1QMEd3OAMg3MyOXh0pd3+G02t6Xg==

Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=L7W1VnZXjVU1AN9Lht9pO982QE1c3cBi4IjBw0an5L3iStLEcSFi64Dwwy/6OcZG/sYH7eL7gpAdVOlwLQsw02CtbwbTcl1+FoF/fXDzjvKeAy5qpuxIvqC2LFdeC7G99/79+/BW/oGrtt+61my9iZ1B2O2JH7fpRtv8qrPIJCaATB0rA5xvrkmEX6h1EHF9A+Fv+YCY9bGo0m0FMv8AqyIP4Obpd0syiQLGlOnqh+QzwdGpN7V77hW3eUF4fcWVNadmnji5Yrj7ujDZtq725MWaLNWEl4IpxkOveab9H84oeHtFWrpE1YyOJ1h03Wh0pi2+NR2Zv7qxENVg7vl6jg==

Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;

Cc: osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 08:07:53 +0000

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.12.2022 02:11, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 175154 xen-unstable real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/175154/ > > Regressions :-( > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > including tests which could not be run: > test-amd64-i386-livepatch 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175144 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-2 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvhv2-amd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-thunderx 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-pair 12 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-i386-pair 13 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-xl-pvshim 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-coresched-amd64-xl 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-examine-uefi 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-amd64-amd64-examine 8 reboot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 > test-arm64-arm64-xl-seattle 8 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. > 175148 Looking at a random one of these failures I find (XEN) Assertion 'nid < MAX_NUMNODES && node_data[nid].node_spanned_pages' failed at ./include/xen/numa.h:76 which makes me wonder whether the NUMA generalization work was actually tested on a variety of x86 hardware. If a swift fix won't turn up, we'll need to figure out how much of your series needs reverting. Jan

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.