Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] xen/riscv: introduce dummy asm/init.h

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

On 10/01/2023 17:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Arm maintainers,
Hi Jan,

> On 10.01.2023 16:17, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/init.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +#ifndef _XEN_ASM_INIT_H
> > +#define _XEN_ASM_INIT_H
> > +
> > +#endif /* _XEN_ASM_INIT_H */
> instead of having RISC-V introduce an empty stub matching what x86 has,
> what would it take to empty Arm's as well, allowing both present ones to
> go away and no new one to be introduced? The only thing you have in there
> is struct init_info, which doesn't feel like it's properly placed in this
> header (x86 has such stuff in setup.h) ...
Yes. setup.h should be a good place even though the header is getting 
quite crowded.
I am happy to send a patch for it.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall