[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3

To: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 15:20:37 +0100
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:20:47 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.01.23 14:44, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:

But, unrelated to this bug, it did get message like in 
https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg107609.html
(WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:523 switch_mm_irqs_off+0x230/0x4a0)


Hmm, is applying the attached patch making any difference here?


Juergen

Attachment: 0001-x86-xen-don-t-let-xen_pv_play_dead-return.patch
Description: Text Data

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
  - From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

References:
- S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
  - From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
- Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
  - From: Juergen Gross
- Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
  - From: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86/acpi: fix suspend with Xen
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/shadow: sanitize iommu_snoop usage
Previous by thread: Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
Next by thread: Re: S3 under Xen regression between 6.1.1 and 6.1.3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.