Re: [QEMU][PATCH v5 09/10] hw/arm: introduce xenpvh machine

[Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/02/2023 18:22, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for reviewing this and other patches in series.
>
> Please see my reply below.
>
> On 2/1/23 12:30 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > On 31/01/2023 22:51, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> > > Add a new machine xenpvh which creates a IOREQ server to 
> > > register/connect with
> > > Xen Hypervisor.
> > Is this really the right way? Is it not possible to do the Xen 
> > initialization (including ioreq server registration) off the back of 
> > the accelerator init (i.e. AccelOpsClass ops_init function), which 
> > seems like the right place to do it now that it's no longer 
> > architecture specific.
> There are few other machines using the "accel=xen" option and few of 
> these machines aren't using IOREQ and other Xen related initialization. 
> Example: /xenpv/ machine under /hw/xenpv/xen_machine_pv.c /and few other 
> machines under /hw/i386/pc_piix.c//.
Ok. TBH the concept of 'accel=xen' is probably somewhat broken then. 
(QEMU isn't even running the VM in question, so how can it be 
accelerated?). Maybe abstract machine types really are the right way then.
  Paul

> /So, that's//why we moved the IOREQ and other common initialization 
> parts in hw/xen/xen-hvm-common.c and call them as needed for the 
> particular machine.
> @stefano, just checking if you want to add any other suggestion here.
>
> >   Paul