[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH linux-next 2/2] x86/xen/time: cleanup xen_tsc_safe_clocksource


  • To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Krister Johansen <kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:18:54 -0800
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; rspamd-9788b98bc-ll7r5; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=kjlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1677172737; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=lRYce4KCQENlo/4Iyy0wDSPQmcZweRPYZ7BvHZ9CWRo=; b=V6BKmAHgsomefRwdKSThgaX2R7oGzr+lBxoYDj+3/vwtQlwE4SqkL+D6un6pZ8LA0Pa3au 9aEAwuUWglj/11VDdegPoEPuA8tZdGcgxG/95rG0LQRYTSUepaLjyI0d0Is21KtjBM5kug c2hGZTcgVUHQSF+2QiLqIZKleCQ1sePjmS/bM9bwi1kFrDQF6a0fpXhJ/c0T7eN7bd7Uxp 66qzCfZLLm/5SC2Ak6D4yAux+gNBeItjD6Eug1NQknMzKetn7Bw+GKfque3+rO1Sv9Bna/ Tf4L3RoldC4tyHbwKbNRDbpiRPuBAFvAJtLeatJrYuAWwk6bdhR70XI3WeRLYQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1677172737; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fmyLAAsEUuGbLGF9pjrJm06bn69Tkq5A/hhz4FxFqvdp7k38zbuLZZTDPlC8fRZOh+njMf 57JCdO1D0lLc0fcgCkqv8IodEFiUdJnD4m8HUf/F45zphacBpRK0z7fMch2K8sRY4Fmeyf eLAtP02F4irsxKnwR2KuDv26oFA3e9UudMualONfkpRqUCAH/8+qG/SsiPTDj+2NyBQKGj Bemj6PB+Qpvdw7oO+LzwGDMewdhNqweYU3emhZq1tJTp1GxcyT4Gs2DTXJXbN17lbbHi5e TCmtRk5F0Zuu3ViW/1K6L5AUdDZLHRzchjhVlDVqWAUxIpaTtCQ4sxgRPkHEjA==
  • Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Reaver <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brendan Gregg <brendan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:19:24 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Hi Marcelo,

On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:34:06AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 08:14:40PM -0800, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:01:18PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 20 2023 at 09:17, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > > > @@ -495,8 +496,7 @@ static int __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void)
> > > >         /* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */
> > > >         cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > > >  
> > > > -       /* tsc_mode = no_emulate (2) */
> > > > -       if (ebx != 2)
> > > > +       if (ebx != XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE)
> > > >                 return 0;
> > > >  
> > > >         return 1;
> > > 
> > > What about removing more stupidity from that function?
> > > 
> > > static bool __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void)
> > > {
> > >   u32 eax, ebx. ecx, edx;
> > >  
> > >   /* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */
> > >   cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> > > 
> > >   return ebx == XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE;
> > > }
> > 
> > I'm all for simplifying.  I'm happy to clean up that return to be more
> > idiomatic.  I was under the impression, perhaps mistaken, though, that
> > the X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, and
> > check_tsc_unstable() checks were actually serving a purpose: to ensure
> > that we don't rely on the tsc in environments where it's being emulated
> > and the OS would be better served by using a PV clock.  Specifically,
> > kvmclock_init() makes a very similar set of checks that I also thought
> > were load-bearing.
> 
> kvmclock_init will lower the rating of kvmclock so that TSC clocksource
> can be used instead:
> 
>         /*
>          * X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC is TSC runs at constant rate
>          * with P/T states and does not stop in deep C-states.
>          *
>          * Invariant TSC exposed by host means kvmclock is not necessary:
>          * can use TSC as clocksource.
>          *
>          */
>         if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) &&
>             boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) &&
>             !check_tsc_unstable())
>                 kvm_clock.rating = 299;

Yes, I saw the change you made to the kvmclock to do this and was
inspired to try to do something similar for Xen:

https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20221216162118.GB2633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,

-K



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.