[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH linux-next 2/2] x86/xen/time: cleanup xen_tsc_safe_clocksource
Hi Marcelo, On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:34:06AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 08:14:40PM -0800, Krister Johansen wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 11:01:18PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 20 2023 at 09:17, Krister Johansen wrote: > > > > @@ -495,8 +496,7 @@ static int __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void) > > > > /* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */ > > > > cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > > > > > > > > - /* tsc_mode = no_emulate (2) */ > > > > - if (ebx != 2) > > > > + if (ebx != XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE) > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > return 1; > > > > > > What about removing more stupidity from that function? > > > > > > static bool __init xen_tsc_safe_clocksource(void) > > > { > > > u32 eax, ebx. ecx, edx; > > > > > > /* Leaf 4, sub-leaf 0 (0x40000x03) */ > > > cpuid_count(xen_cpuid_base() + 3, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); > > > > > > return ebx == XEN_CPUID_TSC_MODE_NEVER_EMULATE; > > > } > > > > I'm all for simplifying. I'm happy to clean up that return to be more > > idiomatic. I was under the impression, perhaps mistaken, though, that > > the X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC, and > > check_tsc_unstable() checks were actually serving a purpose: to ensure > > that we don't rely on the tsc in environments where it's being emulated > > and the OS would be better served by using a PV clock. Specifically, > > kvmclock_init() makes a very similar set of checks that I also thought > > were load-bearing. > > kvmclock_init will lower the rating of kvmclock so that TSC clocksource > can be used instead: > > /* > * X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC is TSC runs at constant rate > * with P/T states and does not stop in deep C-states. > * > * Invariant TSC exposed by host means kvmclock is not necessary: > * can use TSC as clocksource. > * > */ > if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC) && > boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC) && > !check_tsc_unstable()) > kvm_clock.rating = 299; Yes, I saw the change you made to the kvmclock to do this and was inspired to try to do something similar for Xen: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20221216162118.GB2633@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks, -K
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |