Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs/about: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts and qemu-system-i386

[Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 28/2/23 09:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:21:14AM -1000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 2/27/23 10:12, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 11:50:07AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > I feel like we should have separate deprecation entries for the
> > > > i686 host support, and for qemu-system-i386 emulator binary, as
> > > > although they're related they are independant features with
> > > > differing impact. eg removing qemu-system-i386 affects all
> > > > host architectures, not merely 32-bit x86 host, so I think we
> > > > can explain the impact more clearly if we separate them.
> > > Removing qemu-system-i386 seems ok to me - I think qemu-system-x86_64 is
> > > a superset.
> > >
> > > Removing support for building on 32 bit systems seems like a pity - it's
> > > one of a small number of ways to run 64 bit binaries on 32 bit systems,
> > > and the maintainance overhead is quite small.
> > It's not that small.  It only works for single-threaded system mode.  It
> > silently does not honor atomicity for user-only mode, which is perhaps worse
> > not working at all.
Will the same occur with 64-bit hosts when we introduce a 128-bit 
target? If so, there is no much code we'll be able to drop,
> We should probably block multi-threading on 32 bit then.
so this sound a user experience fix.