[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] xen/arm: switch ARM to use generic implementation of bug.h



Hi Julien,
> > > 
> > > > On 24/02/2023 11:31, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> > > > > The following changes were made:
> > > > > * make GENERIC_BUG_FRAME mandatory for ARM
> > > > 
> > > > I have asked in patch #1 but will ask it again because I think
> > > > this
> > > > should be recorded in the commit message. Can you outline why
> > > > it is
> > > > not
> > > > possible to completely switch to the generic version?
> > > 
> > > I have just tried to remove it on arm64 and it seems to work.
> > > This
> > > was
> > > only tested with GCC 10 though. But given the generic version is
> > > not
> > > not
> > > using the %c modifier, then I wouldn't expect any issue.
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > 
> > I tried to switch ARM to generic implementation.
> > 
> > Here is the patch: [1]
> 
> This is similar to the patch I wrote to test with generic
> implementation 
> on Arm (see my other reply).
> 
> [...]
> 
> > (it will be merged with patch 3 if it is OK )
> > 
> > And looks like we can switch ARM to generic implementation as all
> > tests
> > passed:
> > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/791549396
> 
> Thanks for checking with the gitlab CI!
> 
> > 
> > The only issue is with yocto-arm:
> > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/791549396/failures
> > But I am not sure that it is because of my patch
> 
> This looks unrelated to me. This is happening because there is a data
> abort before PSCI (used to reboot the platform) is properly setup. I 
> think we should consider to only print once the error rather than
> every 
> few iterations (not a request for you).
> 
> That said, I am a bit puzzled why this issue is only happening in the
> Yocto test (the Debian one pass). Do you know if the test is passing
> in 
> the normal CI?
I checked several pipelines on the normal CI and it is fine.
> 
> If yes, what other modifications did you do?
It looks like the issue happens after switch ARM to generic
implementation of bug.h:
-
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/792379063/failures
[ failure ]
-
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/792381665/failures
[ passed ]

The difference between builds is only in the commit ' check if ARM can
be fully switched to generic implementation '.
For second one it is reverted so it looks like we can't switch ARM to
generic implementation now as it is required addiotional investigation.

There is no other significant changes ( only the changes mentioned in
the current mail thread ).

Could we go ahead without switching ARM to generic implementation to
not block other RISC-V patch series?

~ Oleksii




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.