[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V2] docs: vhost-user: Add Xen specific memory mapping support
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:40:24PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The current model of memory mapping at the back-end works fine where a > standard call to mmap() (for the respective file descriptor) is enough > before the front-end can start accessing the guest memory. > > There are other complex cases though where the back-end needs more > information and simple mmap() isn't enough. For example Xen, a type-1 > hypervisor, currently supports memory mapping via two different methods, > foreign-mapping (via /dev/privcmd) and grant-dev (via /dev/gntdev). In > both these cases, the back-end needs to call mmap() and ioctl(), and > need to pass extra information via the ioctl(), like the Xen domain-id > of the guest whose memory we are trying to map. > > Add a new protocol feature, 'VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP', which lets > the back-end know about the additional memory mapping requirements. > When this feature is negotiated, the front-end can send the > 'VHOST_USER_SET_XEN_MMAP' message type to provide the additional > information to the back-end. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > V1->V2: > - Make the custom mmap feature Xen specific, instead of being generic. > - Clearly define which memory regions are impacted by this change. > - Allow VHOST_USER_SET_XEN_MMAP to be called multiple times. > - Additional Bit(2) property in flags. > > docs/interop/vhost-user.rst | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst b/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst > index 3f18ab424eb0..8be5f5eae941 100644 > --- a/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst > +++ b/docs/interop/vhost-user.rst > @@ -258,6 +258,24 @@ Inflight description > > :queue size: a 16-bit size of virtqueues > > +Xen mmap description > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > + > ++-------+-------+ > +| flags | domid | > ++-------+-------+ > + > +:flags: 64-bit bit field > + > +- Bit 0 is set for Xen foreign memory memory mapping. > +- Bit 1 is set for Xen grant memory memory mapping. > +- Bit 2 is set if the back-end can directly map additional memory (like > + descriptor buffers or indirect descriptors, which aren't part of already > + shared memory regions) without the need of front-end sending an additional > + memory region first. I don't understand what Bit 2 does. Can you rephrase this? It's unclear to me how additional memory can be mapped without a memory region (especially the fd) is sent? > + > +:domid: a 64-bit Xen hypervisor specific domain id. > + > C structure > ----------- > > @@ -867,6 +885,7 @@ Protocol features > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_INBAND_NOTIFICATIONS 14 > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_CONFIGURE_MEM_SLOTS 15 > #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_STATUS 16 > + #define VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP 17 > > Front-end message types > ----------------------- > @@ -1422,6 +1441,23 @@ Front-end message types > query the back-end for its device status as defined in the Virtio > specification. > > +``VHOST_USER_SET_XEN_MMAP`` > + :id: 41 > + :equivalent ioctl: N/A > + :request payload: Xen mmap description > + :reply payload: N/A > + > + When the ``VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP`` protocol feature has been > + successfully negotiated, this message is submitted by the front-end to set > the > + Xen hypervisor specific memory mapping configurations at the back-end. > These > + configurations should be used to mmap memory regions, virtqueues, > descriptors > + and descriptor buffers. The front-end must send this message before any > + memory-regions are sent to the back-end via ``VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE`` or > + ``VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG`` message types. The front-end can send this > message > + multiple times, if different mmap configurations are required for different > + memory regions, where the most recent ``VHOST_USER_SET_XEN_MMAP`` must be > used > + by the back-end to map any newly shared memory regions. This message modifies the behavior of subsequent VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE and VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG messages. The memory region structs can be extended and then VHOST_USER_SET_XEN_MMAP isn't needed. In other words: When VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_XEN_MMAP is negotiated, each "Memory regions description" and "Single memory region description" has the following additional fields appended: +----------------+-------+ | xen_mmap_flags | domid | +----------------+-------+ :xen_mmap_flags: 64-bit bit field :domid: a 64-bit Xen hypervisor specific domain id. Stefan Attachment:
signature.asc
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |