[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pci: allow slot_reserved_mask to be ignored with manual slot assignment
On 14/03/2023 06:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 12:01:09AM -0400, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote:Commit 4f67543bb8c5 ("xen/pt: reserve PCI slot 2 for Intel igd-passthru") uses slot_reserved_mask to reserve slot 2 for the Intel IGD for the xenfv machine when the guest is configured for igd-passthru. A desired extension to that commit is to allow use of the reserved slot if the administrator manually configures a device to use the reserved slot. Currently, slot_reserved_mask is enforced unconditionally. With this patch, the pci bus can be configured so the slot is only reserved if the pci device to be added to the bus is configured for automatic slot assignment. To enable the desired behavior of slot_reserved_mask machine, add a boolean member enforce_slot_reserved_mask_manual to struct PCIBus and add a function pci_bus_ignore_slot_reserved_mask_manual which can be called to change the default behavior of always enforcing slot_reserved_mask so, in that case, slot_reserved_mask is only enforced when the pci device being added is configured for automatic slot assignment. Call the new pci_bus_ignore_slot_reserved_mask_manual function after creating the pci bus for the pc/i440fx/xenfv machine type to implement the desired behavior of causing slot_reserved_mask to only apply when the pci device to be added to a pc/i440fx/xenfv machine is configured for automatic slot assignment. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20230106064838-mutt-send-email-mst@xxxxxxxxxx/ Signed-off-by: Chuck Zmudzinski <brchuckz@xxxxxxx>I really dislike this. It seems that xen should not have used slot_reserved_mask, and instead needs something new like slot_manual_mask. No? My suggestion was to move the validation logic to a separate callback function in PCIBus (see https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-03/msg03988.html) but perhaps I wasn't clear enough in pointing out that I was thinking this could *replace* the existing slot_reserved_mask mechanism, rather than providing a hook to allow it to be manipulated. Here's a very rough patch put together over lunch that attempts this for pci_bus_devfn_reserved(): the idea is that sun4u and Xen would call pci_bus_set_slot_reserved_fn() with a suitable pci_slot_reserved_fn implementation, and slot_reserved_mask gets removed completely i.e.: diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c index def5000e7b..30b856499a 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pci.c +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c @@ -493,6 +493,13 @@ bool pci_bus_bypass_iommu(PCIBus *bus) return host_bridge->bypass_iommu; } +static bool pci_bus_default_slot_reserved(PCISlotReservationType restype, + int devfn) +{ + /* All slots accessible by default */ + return false; +} + static void pci_root_bus_internal_init(PCIBus *bus, DeviceState *parent, MemoryRegion *address_space_mem, MemoryRegion *address_space_io,@@ -500,7 +507,7 @@ static void pci_root_bus_internal_init(PCIBus *bus, DeviceState *parent, { assert(PCI_FUNC(devfn_min) == 0); bus->devfn_min = devfn_min; - bus->slot_reserved_mask = 0x0; + bus->slot_reserved_fn = pci_bus_default_slot_reserved; bus->address_space_mem = address_space_mem; bus->address_space_io = address_space_io; bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_IS_ROOT; @@ -1111,9 +1118,15 @@ static bool pci_bus_devfn_available(PCIBus *bus, int devfn) return !(bus->devices[devfn]); } -static bool pci_bus_devfn_reserved(PCIBus *bus, int devfn) +static bool pci_bus_devfn_reserved(PCIBus *bus, int devfn, + PCISlotReservationType restype) +{ + return bus->slot_reserved_fn(restype, devfn); +} + +void pci_bus_set_slot_reserved_fn(PCIBus *bus, pci_slot_reserved_fn fn) { - return bus->slot_reserved_mask & (1UL << PCI_SLOT(devfn)); + bus->slot_reserved_fn = fn; } /* -1 for devfn means auto assign */ @@ -1141,7 +1154,7 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice *pci_dev, for(devfn = bus->devfn_min ; devfn < ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices); devfn += PCI_FUNC_MAX) { if (pci_bus_devfn_available(bus, devfn) && - !pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn)) { + !pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn, PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_AUTO)) { goto found; } } @@ -1149,7 +1162,7 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice *pci_dev, "or reserved", name); return NULL; found: ; - } else if (pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn)) { + } else if (pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn, PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_MANUAL)) { error_setg(errp, "PCI: slot %d function %d not available for %s," MemoryRegion *address_space_io,@@ -500,7 +507,7 @@ static void pci_root_bus_internal_init(PCIBus *bus, DeviceState *parent, { assert(PCI_FUNC(devfn_min) == 0); bus->devfn_min = devfn_min; - bus->slot_reserved_mask = 0x0; + bus->slot_reserved_fn = pci_bus_default_slot_reserved; bus->address_space_mem = address_space_mem; bus->address_space_io = address_space_io; bus->flags |= PCI_BUS_IS_ROOT; @@ -1111,9 +1118,15 @@ static bool pci_bus_devfn_available(PCIBus *bus, int devfn) return !(bus->devices[devfn]); } -static bool pci_bus_devfn_reserved(PCIBus *bus, int devfn) +static bool pci_bus_devfn_reserved(PCIBus *bus, int devfn, + PCISlotReservationType restype) +{ + return bus->slot_reserved_fn(restype, devfn); +} + +void pci_bus_set_slot_reserved_fn(PCIBus *bus, pci_slot_reserved_fn fn) { - return bus->slot_reserved_mask & (1UL << PCI_SLOT(devfn)); + bus->slot_reserved_fn = fn; } /* -1 for devfn means auto assign */ @@ -1141,7 +1154,7 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice *pci_dev, for(devfn = bus->devfn_min ; devfn < ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices); devfn += PCI_FUNC_MAX) { if (pci_bus_devfn_available(bus, devfn) && - !pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn)) { + !pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn, PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_AUTO)) { goto found; } } @@ -1149,7 +1162,7 @@ static PCIDevice *do_pci_register_device(PCIDevice *pci_dev, "or reserved", name); return NULL; found: ; - } else if (pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn)) { + } else if (pci_bus_devfn_reserved(bus, devfn, PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_MANUAL)) { error_setg(errp, "PCI: slot %d function %d not available for %s," " reserved", PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn), name); diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h index d5a40cd058..8a949f7ae1 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h @@ -257,10 +257,18 @@ MemoryRegion *pci_address_space_io(PCIDevice *dev); */ int pci_bar(PCIDevice *d, int reg); +typedef enum PCISlotReservationType { + PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_AUTO, + PCI_SLOT_RESERVATION_MANUAL +} PCISlotReservationType; + +typedef bool (*pci_slot_reserved_fn)(PCISlotReservationType restype, int devfn); typedef void (*pci_set_irq_fn)(void *opaque, int irq_num, int level); typedef int (*pci_map_irq_fn)(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int irq_num); typedef PCIINTxRoute (*pci_route_irq_fn)(void *opaque, int pin); +void pci_bus_set_slot_reserved_fn(PCIBus *bus, pci_slot_reserved_fn fn); + #define TYPE_PCI_BUS "PCI" OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE(PCIBus, PCIBusClass, PCI_BUS) #define TYPE_PCIE_BUS "PCIE" diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h index 5653175957..d68ea1418d 100644 --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct PCIBus { PCIIOMMUFunc iommu_fn; void *iommu_opaque; uint8_t devfn_min; - uint32_t slot_reserved_mask; + pci_slot_reserved_fn slot_reserved_fn; pci_set_irq_fn set_irq; pci_map_irq_fn map_irq; pci_route_irq_fn route_intx_to_irq;If this approach seems reasonable, I'm happy for someone else to take this over and turn it into a proper series. ATB, Mark.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |