[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Aw: Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Denis <tachyon_gun@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 20:09:57 +0100
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 19:10:03 +0000
- Importance: normal
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Sensitivity: Normal
- Ui-outboundreport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:HBWskucrB3o=;b3TWLp3Z9P+CV9FH3cUdVlbCDzH myVul0lPJkB0DeBHuqEPdYBX7aAg6wW3pdrtiWs1T3zSB5NwSiUKAROUnn7nG0MdnSWjIPotk h6tCtwxWI/0Ezi/iypULofKEI2hmPNUsKmkKutjTiXg3oO4HBwlRIjSOWDq8H7zCh5v16VybT kaFZZdd6qVqMoRYR0am/+Jyi3erPhfSgGiiqf+v+yIj04KOy82M0zF4BidvSg/RKJRKY0IRr7 BfR//BhRlHkZWL+oYDBbB9kSLYdqo0fEGV9ys26xuqozTBognTqsqqZl5Ik23LEW/RRtB+xKz wGn858xLzAEl//okOUP+cZL+2zxo1H7/faqJFlYkX8+/VbvA0Aa/eC3sCiZbazsrI8BCSscLG 9uakGDwzZQYlJ9O+oCZCySDxEwPU4cjcQgfbMHe1KnQTCQaFdsnCUxhJ84xITp5N/4ULkXPUl 1/X/OcSDb6gX2gFHCdywKxh/Qi2FKTuws6PvMO5c1X0+FSMkcePqQ8Ot92kpGZCbDE82GyB/x wDnK5wkD2mG5st1FUX9i0+8xuQBx0IkUmiamqe3e2RmzcjogA9H+oENCzN6Wpz/LKRKzA7C98 cn5ft+WgEc8azCQO6TXJSZZ7M38db3eN/TEQ0Eiuf1/DZlVd2XX2cYi7RyA3C89KRKUUKaknH yvZ/yNOWStV4g1/OWn8XlzgUvdvzgfIXlPoTFfKs0ASMMcPbs9F4WtSi88Nd6FjM1qBmgnRDD hESoqu/uYyh3BXuhCdCAbUh3W+8VO9udsCLB8pX6PsxFk7v1ufi8EDeKNE4GpjlqlKERRBsJP B2LtJuHy1Su+cqsRx2rSmG6w==
On 14.03.2023 17:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.03.2023 17:45, Denis wrote:
> > On 14.03.2023 16:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 14.03.2023 15:53, Denis wrote:
> >>> What tests could I do or what info should I provide to help?
> >>
> >> Boot plain Linux (no Xen underneath) and collect the full set of kernel
> >> boot messages (some distros store this at /var/log/boot.msg); "full"
> >> meaning we want to be able to see all output regardless of log-level.
> >
> > I'll attach some files from /var/log.
>
> Thanks, and there we go:
>
> [ 0.121463] AMD-Vi: [Firmware Bug]: : No southbridge IOAPIC found
> [ 0.121495] AMD-Vi: Disabling interrupt remapping
>
> It's 5.10, so somewhat old already, but from looking at the code I wouldn't
> expect anything else with a newer kernel.
So older versions (be it Kerenel or Xen) didn't look for a secondary
Southbridge IOAPIC?
If so, was that a change made due to the vulnerabilities in Xen due to
passed-through
devices?
Just asking because age-old distros worked as it seems...
Denis
- References:
- [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Aw: Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: Aw: Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Aw: Re: Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: Aw: Re: Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
- Re: [help] Xen 4.14.5 on Devuan 4.0 Chimaera, regression from Xen 4.0.1
|