[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2] automation: add a suspend test on an Alder Lake system
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:08:42PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Mar 2023, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 04:10:22PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Fri, 17 Mar 2023, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > > +fakeroot -s ../fakeroot-save tar xzf ../binaries/initrd.tar.gz > > > > > > > > I am a bit confused about it: are you sure you need fakeroot for this? > > > > This script is running inside a container as root already? Are you using > > > > Docker on the RPi4 to run this job? > > > > > > This is running in a rootless podman container. But even with docker, > > > for device files to work (see commit message) it would need to run > > > privileged container, which I'd like to avoid. > > > > Are you sure? I can run a non-privileged container with device assigned > > just fine with Docker and > > > > devices = ["/dev/ttyUSB0:/dev/ttyUSB0"] > > > > in the gitlab-runner config.toml. > > It isn't about accessing existing devices, it's about creating them > (unpacking rootfs which contains static /dev) and then packing it back > still having those devices. OK for that definitely you don't need a privileged container. A regular container comes with "root" by default, but without all the privileges that "root" normally allows outside of a container. That is enough (at least in my environments) to pack/unpack a rootfs successfully without fakeroot. Maybe this is a podman-specific limitation? If you are curious to try, you should be able to run a simple pack/unpack rootfs with Docker (of course without --privileged) without issues.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |