[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [XEN v4 02/11] xen/arm: domain_build: Track unallocated pages using the frame number
rangeset_{xxx}_range() functions are invoked with 'start' and 'size' as arguments which are either 'uint64_t' or 'paddr_t'. However, the function accepts 'unsigned long' for 'start' and 'size'. 'unsigned long' is 32 bits for ARM_32. Thus, there is an implicit downcasting from 'uint64_t'/'paddr_t' to 'unsigned long' when invoking rangeset_{xxx}_range(). So, it may seem there is a possibility of lose of data due to truncation. In reality, 'start' and 'size' are always page aligned. And ARM_32 currently supports 40 bits as the width of physical address. So if the addresses are page aligned, the last 12 bits contain zeroes. Thus, we could instead pass page frame number which will contain 28 bits (40-12 on Arm_32) and this can be represented using 'unsigned long'. On Arm_64, this change will not induce any adverse side effect as the width of physical address is 48 bits. Thus, the width of 'mfn' (ie 48 - 12 = 36) can be represented using 'unsigned long' (which is 64 bits wide). Signed-off-by: Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx> --- Changes from - v3 - 1. Extracted the patch from https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2023-02/msg00657.html and added it to this series. 2. Modified add_ext_regions(). This accepts a frame number instead of physical address. xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c index 15fa88e977..24b12b7512 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c @@ -1500,10 +1500,13 @@ static int __init make_resv_memory_node(const struct domain *d, return res; } -static int __init add_ext_regions(unsigned long s, unsigned long e, void *data) +static int __init add_ext_regions(unsigned long s_pfn, unsigned long e_pfn, + void *data) { struct meminfo *ext_regions = data; paddr_t start, size; + paddr_t s = PFN_UP(s_pfn); + paddr_t e = PFN_UP(e_pfn); if ( ext_regions->nr_banks >= ARRAY_SIZE(ext_regions->bank) ) return 0; @@ -1566,7 +1569,8 @@ static int __init find_unallocated_memory(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, { start = bootinfo.mem.bank[i].start; end = bootinfo.mem.bank[i].start + bootinfo.mem.bank[i].size; - res = rangeset_add_range(unalloc_mem, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_add_range(unalloc_mem, PFN_DOWN(start), + PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to add: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1580,7 +1584,8 @@ static int __init find_unallocated_memory(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, { start = assign_mem->bank[i].start; end = assign_mem->bank[i].start + assign_mem->bank[i].size; - res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, PFN_DOWN(start), + PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to remove: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1595,7 +1600,8 @@ static int __init find_unallocated_memory(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, start = bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i].start; end = bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i].start + bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i].size; - res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, PFN_DOWN(start), + PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to remove: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1607,7 +1613,7 @@ static int __init find_unallocated_memory(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, /* Remove grant table region */ start = kinfo->gnttab_start; end = kinfo->gnttab_start + kinfo->gnttab_size; - res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_remove_range(unalloc_mem, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to remove: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1617,7 +1623,7 @@ static int __init find_unallocated_memory(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, start = 0; end = (1ULL << p2m_ipa_bits) - 1; - res = rangeset_report_ranges(unalloc_mem, start, end, + res = rangeset_report_ranges(unalloc_mem, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_DOWN(end), add_ext_regions, ext_regions); if ( res ) ext_regions->nr_banks = 0; @@ -1639,7 +1645,7 @@ static int __init handle_pci_range(const struct dt_device_node *dev, start = addr & PAGE_MASK; end = PAGE_ALIGN(addr + len); - res = rangeset_remove_range(mem_holes, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_remove_range(mem_holes, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to remove: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1677,7 +1683,7 @@ static int __init find_memory_holes(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, /* Start with maximum possible addressable physical memory range */ start = 0; end = (1ULL << p2m_ipa_bits) - 1; - res = rangeset_add_range(mem_holes, start, end); + res = rangeset_add_range(mem_holes, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_DOWN(end)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to add: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1708,7 +1714,8 @@ static int __init find_memory_holes(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, start = addr & PAGE_MASK; end = PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size); - res = rangeset_remove_range(mem_holes, start, end - 1); + res = rangeset_remove_range(mem_holes, PFN_DOWN(start), + PFN_DOWN(end - 1)); if ( res ) { printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to remove: %#"PRIpaddr"->%#"PRIpaddr"\n", @@ -1735,7 +1742,7 @@ static int __init find_memory_holes(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, start = 0; end = (1ULL << p2m_ipa_bits) - 1; - res = rangeset_report_ranges(mem_holes, start, end, + res = rangeset_report_ranges(mem_holes, PFN_DOWN(start), PFN_DOWN(end), add_ext_regions, ext_regions); if ( res ) ext_regions->nr_banks = 0; -- 2.17.1
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |