[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/5] xen/earlycpio: Drop nextoff parameter
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:38:15 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=dakqjN5U3rEqL38YqYMoG9qIj7Qank4HaaLaGPfFkrw=; b=XGsFeCgoYk26DKOXyMfvjWuoM7BOof++hgIQzKDPyUvb0+4eMg1mZljGg5Jer/OErzDGd1LZrgs0Llu84XYt8zCpMDtM1eTMa9bbtUFoEZ6KawXzxGnwxlOobZ6FotW+k1yOGHlRpUs2Fn1RXJsan0l6J58LnfKsgaoeod1aH9OaWsB4eoYaoOlGEH+Sd5DRZlq5ZoKH+9pXIQhsQbTaW9mUgx3nCommdrOUYU/T5WGyn1kmMinBuxJEViYheZDGwH2OmAgVKrDadXjIrqSjz4ZgmAHJSN1OOEeKJK/ChBWvMNxiTJBeF1x/I6KSocKJK1sf9garcozn9pg+UWALjQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=JPEfitOWIZUu0PKAfkGvaN4S2vrVZQrOzX0ky+/1n/W2ASz+LOlAj24qT1qnVGG2EA9gEsZE9V4X3EfUTOxLFCLjCVr3cIOY9GGjgz5JarODTyY+QUpXKeCFz7mFWnqW3XsUdXSbd2sV/hyTASZWfgacLUS52UbqELWk16p/oIQJ2ppk+rrKvrRlV+LQes9nBnV3ZK7fwfKmhzMjoKxJNWbKfH4k2bQjLztYeoUej886XTZBtjIvG+fHGerByBzHsXHNbJCjSXJE4WC/HPLlX5ZP/wFsUvgvS0sChaGZstTsJ6wEnZ4rn/F72TBof8FOWq4Wz0NecCwiu1Ax0A8cHQ==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 13:38:28 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 27.03.2023 21:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> This is imported from Linux, but the parameter being signed is dubious in the
> first place and we're not plausibly going to gain a use for the functionality.
> Linux has subsequently made it an optional parameter to avoid forcing callers
> to pass a stack variable they don't care about using.
>
> In the unlikely case that we gain a usecase, we can reintroduce it, but in the
> meantime simplify the single caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
|
