[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN v5 02/10] xen/arm: Typecast the DT values into paddr_t
- To: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Ayan Kumar Halder <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 15:36:08 +0100
- Cc: sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx, Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx, bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx, wl@xxxxxxx, rahul.singh@xxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:36:29 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 19/04/2023 15:29, Michal Orzel wrote:
I am not in favor of changing of the CODING_STYLE and I thought I would
express it right now to spare the round-trip of writing a patch.
Sure thing :)
So, all in all, we agree that SPDX comment must be a single line comment on its
own
(which is also stated in our CODING_STYLE) and not like it was placed in this
patch, right?
Correct.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|
