[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] xen/vcpu: ignore VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 12:38:59PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.04.2023 16:31, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > The usage of VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future in Linux prior to 4.7 is bogus. > > When the hypervisor returns -ETIME (timeout in the past) Linux keeps > > retrying to setup the timer with a higher timeout instead of > > self-injecting a timer interrupt. > > > > On boxes without any hardware assistance for logdirty we have seen HVM > > Linux guests < 4.7 with 32vCPUs give up trying to setup the timer when > > logdirty is enabled: > > > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > CE: xen increased min_delta_ns to 1000000 nsec > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > CE: xen increased min_delta_ns to 506250 nsec > > CE: xen increased min_delta_ns to 759375 nsec > > CE: xen increased min_delta_ns to 1000000 nsec > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > CE: Reprogramming failure. Giving up > > Freezing user space processes ... > > INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 14} (detected by 10, > > t=60002 jiffies, g=4006, c=4005, q=14130) > > Task dump for CPU 14: > > swapper/14 R running task 0 0 1 0x00000000 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffff90160f5d>] ? rcu_eqs_enter_common.isra.30+0x3d/0xf0 > > [<ffffffff907b9bde>] ? default_idle+0x1e/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff90039570>] ? arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0xc0 > > [<ffffffff9010820a>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x14a/0x1e0 > > [<ffffffff9005d3a7>] ? start_secondary+0x1f7/0x270 > > [<ffffffff900000d5>] ? start_cpu+0x5/0x14 > > INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 26} (detected by 24, > > t=60002 jiffies, g=6922, c=6921, q=7013) > > Task dump for CPU 26: > > swapper/26 R running task 0 0 1 0x00000000 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffff90160f5d>] ? rcu_eqs_enter_common.isra.30+0x3d/0xf0 > > [<ffffffff907b9bde>] ? default_idle+0x1e/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff90039570>] ? arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0xc0 > > [<ffffffff9010820a>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x14a/0x1e0 > > [<ffffffff9005d3a7>] ? start_secondary+0x1f7/0x270 > > [<ffffffff900000d5>] ? start_cpu+0x5/0x14 > > INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 26} (detected by 24, > > t=60002 jiffies, g=8499, c=8498, q=7664) > > Task dump for CPU 26: > > swapper/26 R running task 0 0 1 0x00000000 > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffff90160f5d>] ? rcu_eqs_enter_common.isra.30+0x3d/0xf0 > > [<ffffffff907b9bde>] ? default_idle+0x1e/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff90039570>] ? arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0xc0 > > [<ffffffff9010820a>] ? cpu_startup_entry+0x14a/0x1e0 > > [<ffffffff9005d3a7>] ? start_secondary+0x1f7/0x270 > > [<ffffffff900000d5>] ? start_cpu+0x5/0x14 > > > > Thus leading to CPU stalls and a broken system as a result. > > > > Workaround this bogus usage by ignoring the VCPU_SSHOTTMR_future in > > the hypervisor. Old Linux versions are the only ones known to have > > (wrongly) attempted to use the flag, and ignoring it is compatible > > with the behavior expected by any guests setting that flag. > > > > Note the usage of the flag has been removed from Linux by commit: > > > > c06b6d70feb3 xen/x86: don't lose event interrupts > > > > Which landed in Linux 4.7. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx> # CHANGELOG > > A little hesitantly, but since no-one else appears to show any interest: > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Thanks. Roger.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |