Re: [PATCH v5 00/21] block: remove aio_disable_external() API

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 09.05.2023 um 19:51 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 11:44:42PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.05.2023 um 21:53 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > v5:
> > > - Use atomic accesses for in_flight counter in vhost-user-server.c [Kevin]
> > > - Stash SCSIDevice id/lun values for VIRTIO_SCSI_T_TRANSPORT_RESET event
> > >   before unrealizing the SCSIDevice [Kevin]
> > > - Keep vhost-user-blk export .detach() callback so ctx is set to NULL 
> > > [Kevin]
> > > - Narrow BdrvChildClass and BlockDriver drained_{begin/end/poll} 
> > > callbacks from
> > >   IO_OR_GS_CODE() to GLOBAL_STATE_CODE() [Kevin]
> > > - Include Kevin's "block: Fix use after free in blockdev_mark_auto_del()" 
> > > to
> > >   fix a latent bug that was exposed by this series
> > 
> > I only just finished reviewing v4 when you had already sent v5, but it
> > hadn't arrived yet. I had a few more comments on what are now patches
> > 17, 18, 19 and 21 in v5. I think they all still apply.
> 
> I'm not sure which comments from v4 still apply. In my email client all
> your replies were already read when I sent v5.

Yes, but I added some more replies after you had sent v5 (and before I
fetched mail again to actually see v5).

> Maybe you can share the Message-Id of something I still need to address?

I thought the patch numbers identified them and were easier, but sure:

Message-ID: <ZFQc89cFJuoGF+qI@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <ZFQgBvWShB4NCymj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <ZFQivbkVPcX3nECA@xxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <ZFQk2TdhZ6DiwM4t@xxxxxxxxxx>

Kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature