[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > More staring at this tomorrow, on a clear head. Yeah, I'm going to leave it as is. Tried doing a union with bitfields but doesn't get any prettier. Next crapola: The Intel box says now: [ 8.138683] sgx: EPC section 0x80200000-0x85ffffff [ 8.204838] pmd_set_huge: Cannot satisfy [mem 0x80200000-0x80400000] with a huge-page mapping due to MTRR override, uniform: 0 (I've extended the debug output). and that happens because [ 8.174229] mtrr_type_lookup: mtrr_state_set: 1 [ 8.178909] mtrr_type_lookup: start: 0x80200000, cache_map[3].start: 0x88800000 that's if (start < cache_map[i].start) { in mtrr_type_lookup(). I fail to see how that check would work for the range 0x80200000-0x80400000 and the MTRR map is: [ 0.000587] MTRR map: 4 entries (3 fixed + 1 variable; max 23), built from 10 variable MTRRs [ 0.000588] 0: 0000000000000000-000000000009ffff write-back [ 0.000589] 1: 00000000000a0000-00000000000bffff uncachable [ 0.000590] 2: 00000000000c0000-00000000000fffff write-protect [ 0.000591] 3: 0000000088800000-00000000ffffffff uncachable so the UC range comes after this one we request. [ 8.186372] mtrr_type_lookup: type: 0x6, cache_map[3].type: 0x0 now the next type merging happens and the 3rd region's type is UC, ofc. [ 8.192433] type_merge: type: 0x6, new_type: 0x0, effective_type: 0x0, clear uniform we clear uniform and we fail: [ 8.200331] mtrr_type_lookup: ret, uniform: 0 So this map lookup thing is wrong in this case. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |