Re: [PATCH] SUPPORT.md: explicitly mention EFI (secure) boot status

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Jan,

On 11/05/2023 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> While normal booting is properly supported on both x86 and Arm64, secure
> boot reportedly requires quite a bit more work to be actually usable
> (and providing the intended guarantees). The mere use of the shim
> protocol for verifying the Dom0 kernel image isn't enough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers,

> --- a/SUPPORT.md
> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
> @@ -63,6 +63,16 @@ For the Cortex A57 r0p0 - r1p1, see Erra
>       Status, x86 PV: Supported
>       Status, ARM: Experimental
>   
> +### Host EFI Boot
> +
> +    Status, x86: Supported
> +    Status, Arm64: Supported
> +
> +### Host EFI Secure Boot
> +
> +    Status, x86: Experimental
> +    Status, Arm64: Experimental
> +
>   ### x86/Intel Platform QoS Technologies
>   
>       Status: Tech Preview
--
Julien Grall