[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/x86/pvh: use preset XSDT header for XSDT generation
On Mon, 15 May 2023, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 15.05.2023 10:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 06:17:19PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > >> > >> Xen always generates a XSDT table even if the firmware provided a RSDT > >> table. Instead of copying the XSDT header from the firmware table (that > >> might be missing), generate the XSDT header from a preset. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c | 32 +++++++++----------------------- > >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > >> index 307edc6a8c..5fde769863 100644 > >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c > >> @@ -963,13 +963,18 @@ static int __init pvh_setup_acpi_xsdt(struct domain > >> *d, paddr_t madt_addr, > >> paddr_t *addr) > >> { > >> struct acpi_table_xsdt *xsdt; > >> - struct acpi_table_header *table; > >> - struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp; > >> const struct acpi_table_desc *tables = > >> acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables; > >> unsigned long size = sizeof(*xsdt); > >> unsigned int i, j, num_tables = 0; > >> - paddr_t xsdt_paddr; > >> int rc; > >> + struct acpi_table_header header = { > >> + .signature = "XSDT", > >> + .length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_header), > >> + .revision = 0x1, > >> + .oem_id = "Xen", > >> + .oem_table_id = "HVM", > > > > I think this is wrong, as according to the spec the OEM Table ID must > > match the OEM Table ID in the FADT. > > > > We likely want to copy the OEM ID and OEM Table ID from the RSDP, and > > possibly also the other OEM related fields. > > > > Alternatively we might want to copy and use the RSDT on systems that > > lack an XSDT, or even just copy the header from the RSDT into Xen's > > crafted XSDT, since the format of the RSDP and the XSDT headers are > > exactly the same (the difference is in the size of the description > > headers that come after). > > I guess I'd prefer that last variant. I tried this approach (together with the second patch for necessity) and it worked. diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c index fd2cbf68bc..11d6d1bc23 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/dom0_build.c @@ -967,6 +967,10 @@ static int __init pvh_setup_acpi_xsdt(struct domain *d, paddr_t madt_addr, goto out; } xsdt_paddr = rsdp->xsdt_physical_address; + if ( !xsdt_paddr ) + { + xsdt_paddr = rsdp->rsdt_physical_address; + } acpi_os_unmap_memory(rsdp, sizeof(*rsdp)); table = acpi_os_map_memory(xsdt_paddr, sizeof(*table)); if ( !table )
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |