[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v3 11/12] x86/shadow: vCPU-s never have "no mode"


  • To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 09:42:13 +0200
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=+LSqkT5W5RDveh4x9HUNVR27+X3P8oPB/8p3ASxxGxk=; b=W1oryS4xJc4AboF//dZiex3vCKd7FomkrFqFqmUCI6Xk0A4Er4nq2reCE0l1Y/tEd3iNLm5eEL/GuApuMcickx7q6KBB+sAH0D/MuCRrtG9g1dfkXWMfOGcFtKD3aZ105fPwIlOH4F8K5cYDuhF9WkkgsvFKqgyL6SPDazvRCguQ8eCwFoBbwUW787+cNxJlTVUVqZswfUeirQQ6ksEqRBPfz8BHPw14GtmrLNDJSti0Qj5ju89Z0QI8TTpl4axU0FbfGeyXbpsudwqHlLROY6K8TrhptwpY8ljTqlu7gbbtctczsVt7V/ZS8iVnSqpkBkg7lJuaXrBMn8c3TdCtGQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bq/lQuVdBH8OJVxvLkuI7ZYKR/3R51JXaBu1RSxMhygmomyGqoeM+Lw+EHn5Q8kGVhlaJTs6wnMtHwvGDQ/HNVdhN9UEKFOdWNnxWHbnGJTZh7BuQXsoNYbZdlPL5CxK1dBNDzivvuU9Y18j01RDeijHebKkyD7sUBBgKpk6pnIgQldJ+fiN2QTziuePEwBjIL4qevJu7t354A99X0hXVm6ZEyQom+tFOek3mYKa1MFb17CkgXoY6O6B4epVvy3s/c+pSxp0bhSDC/3LgMikexMdcMNJVyy2VNbGWnIaPNMtWj07etmT8Itu29ZMPUA0F3U1TOOAr9lm1nO+hLFJug==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 16 May 2023 07:47:37 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

With an initial mode installed by shadow_vcpu_init(), there's no need
for sh_update_paging_modes() to deal with the "mode is still unset"
case. Leave an assertion, though.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c
@@ -1854,6 +1854,8 @@ static void sh_update_paging_modes(struc
             make_cr3(v, mmfn);
             hvm_update_host_cr3(v);
         }
+        else if ( !old_mode )
+            ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
         else if ( v->arch.paging.mode != old_mode )
         {
             SHADOW_PRINTK("new paging mode: %pv pe=%d gl=%u "
@@ -1862,11 +1864,10 @@ static void sh_update_paging_modes(struc
                           hvm_paging_enabled(v),
                           v->arch.paging.mode->guest_levels,
                           v->arch.paging.mode->shadow.shadow_levels,
-                          old_mode ? old_mode->guest_levels : 0,
-                          old_mode ? old_mode->shadow.shadow_levels : 0);
-            if ( old_mode &&
-                 (v->arch.paging.mode->shadow.shadow_levels !=
-                  old_mode->shadow.shadow_levels) )
+                          old_mode->guest_levels,
+                          old_mode->shadow.shadow_levels);
+            if ( v->arch.paging.mode->shadow.shadow_levels !=
+                 old_mode->shadow.shadow_levels )
             {
                 /* Need to make a new monitor table for the new mode */
                 mfn_t new_mfn, old_mfn;




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.