[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: PVH Dom0 related UART failure
On Sat, 20 May 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > index ec2e978a4e6b..0ff8e940fa8d 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c > @@ -289,6 +289,13 @@ static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, > uint16_t cmd, bool rom_only) > */ > for_each_pdev ( pdev->domain, tmp ) > { > + if ( !tmp->vpci ) > + { > + printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING "%pp: not handled by vPCI for %pd\n", > + &tmp->sbdf, pdev->domain); > + continue; > + } > + > if ( tmp == pdev ) > { > /* > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c > index 652807a4a454..0baef3a8d3a1 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c > @@ -72,7 +72,12 @@ int vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev) > unsigned int i; > int rc = 0; > > - if ( !has_vpci(pdev->domain) ) > + if ( !has_vpci(pdev->domain) || > + /* > + * Ignore RO and hidden devices, those are in use by Xen and vPCI > + * won't work on them. > + */ > + pci_get_pdev(dom_xen, pdev->sbdf) ) > return 0; > > /* We should not get here twice for the same device. */ Now this patch works! Thank you!! :-) You can check the full logs here https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/sstabellini/xen/-/jobs/4329259080 Is the patch ready to be upstreamed aside from the commit message?
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |