[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] xen: enable Dom0 to use SVE feature


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 11:50:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Gntxz5waQTKUMc2v5Abr7thKpt6n/nRJDpo0w5JvnFk=; b=AnMImUt8Tl5geEhz9pK5yDXGKxtiydGOGoYrtWycX6+5w92rlc6PUEkyYoMestLREWVb5ueyvhkdup/QDMBEZEGSeaVJ4JHX9khZQbgyGE50VC/wU4Jpog4Q4qAiEAo1CxwH4cqG91o5BoTXkZWkeBelsEAkGQCBpCKZ89qbJeZK6nAT3kd6djFWIus3lCrYTYoggn6kIXqASDfRg8NpTKu/fDHqUlp3ZSb9kCFo/5Kk65PP4KTg57syl/OaysjzL5nIf1yzhQybSQnLvJ6HRCMA03VByhHKA79vuFqhHmYxoSZOfa/tDuAjeZw0bZfMlCfDEsBmpLyXRpQsYhhRtQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ankw7P3NO9EB0dwHzGMNIq0ZtGP1VdPuhTMOF5H8tsq+skdsq36JrHK3PFG0tbJ0oUWNW5XyFdAuyt5fNm5pjnRGLm+2ALBnKQW2WvEIpqV+RLdiH5Uj41l8JERxhU64KgoW0rE1DLD1GIlDaq5SB983lEA07+R3caOt7U7cHdWdX5R2O83fsMHJmBZAqNLs5iDRrL6GLMsR4Y1p/N+uPNjmkZ0hGMIsZr8oR4o3XfWSjXsksHCA2LVzXKBOCFPX+V2iLr0V59GK5FfQwNuc0X2cCXJvVKoVcRhHYJAFGoD61IV2SvJAkoFvpLt4RBK6TfSPtoYoOtjnCmaMkr4syQ==
  • Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Cc: Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2023 11:51:04 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: true
  • Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
  • Thread-index: AQHZjUpfkyJmVIVJBUW8KdO0aW075a9noLWAgAAFYICAAALiAIAAFdcA
  • Thread-topic: [PATCH v7 07/12] xen: enable Dom0 to use SVE feature


> On 23 May 2023, at 11:31, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 23.05.2023 12:21, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>> On 23 May 2023, at 11:02, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 23.05.2023 09:43, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>>>> @@ -838,6 +838,22 @@ Controls for how dom0 is constructed on x86 systems.
>>>> 
>>>>    If using this option is necessary to fix an issue, please report a bug.
>>>> 
>>>> +Enables features on dom0 on Arm systems.
>>>> +
>>>> +*   The `sve` integer parameter enables Arm SVE usage for Dom0 domain and 
>>>> sets
>>>> +    the maximum SVE vector length, the option is applicable only to 
>>>> AArch64
>>>> +    guests.
>>> 
>>> Why "guests"? Does the option affect more than Dom0?
>> 
>> I used “guests” because in my mind I was referring to all the aarch64 OS 
>> that can be used
>> as control domain, I can change it if it sounds bad.
> 
> If you means OSes then better also say OSes. But maybe this doesn't need
> specifically expressing, by saying e.g. "..., the option is applicable
> only on AArch64"? Or can a Dom0 be 32-bit on Arm64 Xen?

I think there is no limitation so Dom0 can be 32 bit or 64. Maybe I can say
“... AArch64 kernel guests.”?

> 
>>>> +    A value equal to 0 disables the feature, this is the default value.
>>>> +    Values below 0 means the feature uses the maximum SVE vector length
>>>> +    supported by hardware, if SVE is supported.
>>>> +    Values above 0 explicitly set the maximum SVE vector length for Dom0,
>>>> +    allowed values are from 128 to maximum 2048, being multiple of 128.
>>>> +    Please note that when the user explicitly specifies the value, if 
>>>> that value
>>>> +    is above the hardware supported maximum SVE vector length, the domain
>>>> +    creation will fail and the system will stop, the same will occur if 
>>>> the
>>>> +    option is provided with a non zero value, but the platform doesn't 
>>>> support
>>>> +    SVE.
>>> 
>>> Assuming this also covers the -1 case, I wonder if that isn't a little too
>>> strict. "Maximum supported" imo can very well be 0.
>> 
>> Maximum supported, when platforms uses SVE, can be at minimum 128 by arm 
>> specs.
> 
> When there is SVE - sure. But when there's no SVE, 0 is kind of the implied
> length. And I'd view a command line option value of -1 quite okay in that
> case: They've asked for the maximum supported, so they'll get 0. No reason
> to crash the system during boot.

Ok I see what you mean, for example when Kconfig SVE is enabled, but the 
platform doesn’t
have SVE feature, requesting sve=-1 will keep the value to 0, and no system 
will be stopped.

Maybe I can say: 

“... the same will occur if the option is provided with a positive non zero 
value,
but the platform doesn't support SVE."



> 
> Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.