[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] x86: do away with HAVE_AS_NEGATIVE_TRUE
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 13:48:43 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=X/nPEb9G4LjMOi1yfKSgDLkmh3WnvlncUMic08Ivb9k=; b=Y5GZAlN2rcw8KfBjr89YItMFy09KgywRKTJq6kJei8g7Biu8ZzzC4o/6Bg9FqOFgWfJ5PJHdArHGUVdFOXcjwso40O8TfMWRf6szHTVbVJO4i9ejhjhD03w/PQrwDnxecCTsfL7wpyvJrQoQBELTv2Wb7g4I5kr4fN/jNisqbracWFm1OGWFuRN/IynT2INAOWXRwZV0MEOWaWVRaXBSdHNsWad0LkaXE10H6n+iYBZDbEk3hx7rjm1pBvdAugOh+Ov6ktAQb3r3LtU28SlefYXcDh2Dw+o3HKVruJpAfWf+QO2NcrbqQdc9R/l9yeUnSQlNoCn/R9HR50/TZC30rg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LlJv3mj+wgslz1bIkDemjjqIzo45KiUmpybouzHjAf0NsyskRTQQgZ+OsVp24XfbpUIilcNmEJJzBHv0CjVjbsjVYXakY4EK+yc6VVRkhms3Y2F06MN/ebzTnYlE0sry1jQOxy4SM3pO0P0sEFzFAICzmnq4tvhZE2HSpVq/Qnmk8ZVh/mErsiZnnVnzRJ9a8VhLDA9O9f2CT9YPH0K3TfYf+mXlY6TItFFDjtVqPJyPCy+bclXmyXVGaPgMB3A1ujBNH1qJGAaL10c47IaMcM2Do6MqW2/TcBg2/r+1rrYO6aOKcrtEscAu8M7bDPzvySYlylr84bNoCmXYCIG4AQ==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2023 12:49:13 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:3h4i7Khxl4T/2E1Ympd5fsP+X161TREKZh0ujC45NGQN5FlHY01je htvDzyBPKmCYDPyKYh1Oozj901X7MXUnNNmGQQ5/yBnECsb9cadCdqndUqhZCn6wu8v7q5Ex 55HNoSfdpBcolv0/ErF3m3J9CEkvU2wbuOgTrWCYmYpHlUMpB4J0XpLg/Q+jpNjne+3CgaMv cKai8DEMRqu1iUc3lg8sspvkzsx+qyq0N8klgZmP6sT4QWFzyN94K83fsldEVOpGuG4IcbiL wrz5OnR1n/U+R4rFuSknt7TGqHdauePVeQmoiM+t5mK2nCulARrukoIHKN0hXNsoyeIh7hMJ OBl7vRcf+uL0prkw4zxWzEAe8130DYvFLXveRBTuuTLp6HKnueFL1yDwyjaMKVBktubD12i+ tQxMS9cUyKcjtu12ZmGa+Bzm8YFFPbCadZ3VnFIlVk1DN4AaLWaG+DmwIEd2z09wMdTAfzZe swVLyJ1awjNaAFOPVFRD48imOCvhT/0dDgwRFC9/PJrpTSMilEhluG1YLI5efTTLSlRtm+eq njL4CLSBRYCOcbE4TGE7mitlqnEmiaTtIc6TeXpp6I73wbLroAVID4vV0Phpqi7sUWFVcBBJ GgExXErirdnoSRHSfG4BXVUukWsvBQRRt5RGO0S8xyWx+zf5APxLngJSHtNZcIrsOcyRCc2z RmZktXxHzttvbaJD3WH+d+8sjeaKSUTa2gYakc5oRAt5tDipMQ/i0zJR9M6SKqt1IStSXf33 iyAqzU4i/MLl8kX2q6n/FfBxTWxupzOSQ1z7QLSNo640j5EiEeeT9TAwTDmATxode51knHpU KA4pvWj
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:iJIPuKEFS3Y8+jfKpLqFCJLXdLJyesId70hD6qkvc203TiXIra CTdaogtCMcRgxhIU3I/urwSZVoIEmsi6KdhLN/TNWftWbdyRCVxb9ZnKHfKlHbakrDH6tmpN tdm0YXMqynMbBV5fyKyDVQOexQlOVuyciT9M7jJ50Ed3BAV0gY1XYvNu/5KDwEeOA5P+tCKH PG3LsTm9PIQx1+Ba7Xahd1OpmmmzDSruO6XfdFPW9Z1OCgt0KE1FeQKWnh4v5xaUIo/V/imV K1wDAQsc6YwoGGI1LnpiXuxqUTvOGk5spIBcSKhMRQAjLwijywbIAkf7GZpjg6rMym9V5vyb D30lsdFvU2z0mUUnC+oBPr1QWl+DEy60X6wVvdpXf4u8T2SB8zFsIEr4NEdRny7VYmobhHoe 929lPck6ASIQLLnSz76dSNfxZ2lnCsqX5nquIXh2w3a/pWVJZh6agkuG9FGpYJGyz3rKo9Fv N1Mc3a7PFKNXuHcnHwpABUsZyRd0V2Oi3DblkJu8ST3TQTtmt+1VEkyMsWmWpF3I4hSqND+/ /PPs1T5fBzp/ctHOBA7do6MI6K4jSne2OJDIvSGyWoKEg/AQOPl3ati49Fo91De/Qzve0Pcd r6IRVlXFUJCjbT4P21re92Gy/2MRCAtEzWu7xjDxcQgMyveFPKC1zKdLl8qbrqnxxYOLyVZ9 +DfKtMBfntNG3vHpsM8THfdvBpWCEjefxQg808XV2WpMLNN8nNjcz0NNjuBJeFK0d8ZovEaE FzBgQb4P8wtXyDazvDmRDUbXvmZ0z4+vtLYfjn1tlW8pEEMrtGuhN9syXm2ui7bQdauqgBZ0 dmJqj7+5nL9FWezCLz9m1sDABWCF1YiY+QDE9ilEsxKkvxR6wIvc6ST2BUwRK8V0NCZtKTCR VYoVtv/6KxMtib3iY5Ec+qNWqckhIo1QW3c6s=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 23/05/2023 1:37 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> There's no real need for the associated probing - we can easily convert
> to a uniform value without knowing the specific behavior (note also that
> the respective comments weren't fully correct and have gone stale).
>
> No difference in generated code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks. I do think this form is easier to follow.
~Andrew
|
