[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3] iscsi_ibft: Fix finding the iBFT under Xen Dom 0
- To: konrad@xxxxxxxxxx, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:30:34 +0200
- Cc: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, X86 ML <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:30:46 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 09.06.23 17:27, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Usually I put it in my tree (ibft) but since it is so simple and the user is Xen
it would make more sense to do it via the Xen tree (Juergen).
Works for me.
Juergen
Thx
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023, 11:16 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 6/5/23 03:28, Ross Lagerwall wrote:
> The result of these changes is that it is possible to boot a diskless
> Xen + Dom0 running off an iSCSI disk whereas previously it would fail to
> find the iBFT and consequently, the iSCSI root disk.
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> # for x86
The work in this patch seems pretty evenly split between x86 and iSCSI.
Any preferences on who picks it up?
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|
