[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 4/4] Strict XenStore entry parsing
- To: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 04:26:33 +0100
- Cc: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@xxxxxxxxx>, Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx>, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 03:27:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 10:57:59PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> This uses the newly-introduced strict version of sscanf().
I can see that. Why does it do that?
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
(in general, there is a lack of detail across all four of these patches
justifying why any of this work is being done. it isn't obvious to me
why skipping leading whitespace is bad in this context)
|
