Re: [PATCH v5 26/33] nios2: Convert __pte_free_tlb() to use ptdescs

[Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/27/23 13:05, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 6/27/23 14:56, Vishal Moola wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 12:14 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 6/27/23 12:10, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 6/27/23 10:42, Vishal Moola wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 10:47 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 01:57:38PM -0700, Vishal Moola (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > > > > Part of the conversions to replace pgtable constructor/destructors with
> > > > > > > ptdesc equivalents.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > This patch causes all nios2 builds to fail.
> > > > > It looks like you tried to apply this patch on its own. This patch depends
> > > > > on patches 01-12 of this patchset to compile properly. I've cross-compiled
> > > > > this architecture and it worked, but let me know if something fails
> > > > > when its applied on top of those patches (or the rest of the patchset).
> > > >
> > > > No, I did not try to apply this patch on its own. I tried to build yesterday's
> > > > pending-fixes branch of linux-next.
> > > A quick check shows that the build fails with next-20230627. See log below.
> > Ah it looks like this one slipped into -next on its own somehow? Stephen, please
> > drop this patch from -next; it shouldn't be in without the rest of the
> > patchset which
> > I intend to have Andrew take through the mm tree.
> I apologize, but I queue this patch up for Linus and it's been pulled for this 
> merge window. I didn't realize you were going to take this patchset through 
> another tree.
>
> Sorry about that.
Yes, indeed, I just confirmed that all nios2 builds in the mainline kernel
are now broken.

Guenter