[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 01/32] block: Provide blkdev_get_handle_* functions
- To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 17:14:01 +0100
- Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna@xxxxxxxxxx>, Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gao Xiang <xiang@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxx>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>, jfs-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joern Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-bcache@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-f2fs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nilfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-nvme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@xxxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>, ocfs2-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ted Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 16:15:06 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 07:06:26AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/4/23 05:21, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +struct bdev_handle {
> > + struct block_device *bdev;
> > + void *holder;
> > +};
>
> Please explain in the patch description why a holder pointer is introduced
> in struct bdev_handle and how it relates to the bd_holder pointer in struct
> block_device. Is one of the purposes of this patch series perhaps to add
> support for multiple holders per block device?
That is all in patch 0/32. Why repeat it?
|
