[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2] xen/evtchn: Introduce new IOCTL to bind static evtchn
Hi , > On 9 Jul 2023, at 1:10 am, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2023, Rahul Singh wrote: >> Hi Oleksandr, >> >> Thanks for reviewing the code. >> >>> On 29 Jun 2023, at 7:06 pm, Oleksandr Tyshchenko >>> <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 29.06.23 18:46, Rahul Singh wrote: >>> >>> Hello Rahul >>> >>> >>>> Xen 4.17 supports the creation of static evtchns. To allow user space >>>> application to bind static evtchns introduce new ioctl >>>> "IOCTL_EVTCHN_BIND_STATIC". Existing IOCTL doing more than binding >>>> that’s why we need to introduce the new IOCTL to only bind the static >>>> event channels. >>>> >>>> Also, static evtchns to be available for use during the lifetime of the >>>> guest. When the application exits, __unbind_from_irq() ends up being >>>> called from release() file operations because of that static evtchns >>>> are getting closed. To avoid closing the static event channel, add the >>>> new bool variable "is_static" in "struct irq_info" to mark the event >>>> channel static when creating the event channel to avoid closing the >>>> static evtchn. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Singh <rahul.singh@xxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> v2: >>>> * Use bool in place u8 to define is_static variable. >>>> * Avoid closing the static evtchns in error path. >>> >>> >>> Patch looks good to me, just a nit (question) below. >>> >>> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 7 +++++-- >>>> drivers/xen/evtchn.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- >>>> include/uapi/xen/evtchn.h | 9 +++++++++ >>>> include/xen/events.h | 2 +- >>>> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c >>>> b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c >>>> index c7715f8bd452..5d3b5c7cfe64 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c >>>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct irq_info { >>>> unsigned int irq_epoch; /* If eoi_cpu valid: irq_epoch of event */ >>>> u64 eoi_time; /* Time in jiffies when to EOI. */ >>>> raw_spinlock_t lock; >>>> + bool is_static; /* Is event channel static */ >>>> >>>> union { >>>> unsigned short virq; >>>> @@ -982,7 +983,8 @@ static void __unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq) >>>> unsigned int cpu = cpu_from_irq(irq); >>>> struct xenbus_device *dev; >>>> >>>> - xen_evtchn_close(evtchn); >>>> + if (!info->is_static) >>>> + xen_evtchn_close(evtchn); >>>> >>>> switch (type_from_irq(irq)) { >>>> case IRQT_VIRQ: >>>> @@ -1574,7 +1576,7 @@ int xen_set_irq_priority(unsigned irq, unsigned >>>> priority) >>>> } >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_set_irq_priority); >>>> >>>> -int evtchn_make_refcounted(evtchn_port_t evtchn) >>>> +int evtchn_make_refcounted(evtchn_port_t evtchn, bool is_static) >>>> { >>>> int irq = get_evtchn_to_irq(evtchn); >>>> struct irq_info *info; >>>> @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ int evtchn_make_refcounted(evtchn_port_t evtchn) >>>> WARN_ON(info->refcnt != -1); >>>> >>>> info->refcnt = 1; >>>> + info->is_static = is_static; >>>> >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c >>>> index c99415a70051..e6d2303478b2 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/xen/evtchn.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/evtchn.c >>>> @@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ static int evtchn_resize_ring(struct per_user_data *u) >>>> return 0; >>>> } >>>> >>>> -static int evtchn_bind_to_user(struct per_user_data *u, evtchn_port_t >>>> port) >>>> +static int evtchn_bind_to_user(struct per_user_data *u, evtchn_port_t >>>> port, >>>> + bool is_static) >>>> { >>>> struct user_evtchn *evtchn; >>>> struct evtchn_close close; >>>> @@ -402,14 +403,16 @@ static int evtchn_bind_to_user(struct per_user_data >>>> *u, evtchn_port_t port) >>>> if (rc < 0) >>>> goto err; >>>> >>>> - rc = evtchn_make_refcounted(port); >>>> + rc = evtchn_make_refcounted(port, is_static); >>>> return rc; >>>> >>>> err: >>>> /* bind failed, should close the port now */ >>>> - close.port = port; >>>> - if (HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op(EVTCHNOP_close, &close) != 0) >>>> - BUG(); >>>> + if (!is_static) { >>> >>> >>> I think now "struct evtchn_close close;" can be placed here as it is not >>> used outside of this block. >>> >>> Also this block looks like an open-coded version of xen_evtchn_close() >>> defined at events_base.c, so maybe it is worth making xen_evtchn_close() >>> static inline and placing it into events.h, then calling helper here? >>> Please note, I will be ok either way. >> >> Make sense. I will modify the patch as per your request in the next version. >> I will wait for other maintainers to review the patch before sending the >> next version. > > I don't have any further comments. Thanks for the update. I will send the next version. Regards, Rahul
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |