[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] mm/pdx: Add comments throughout the codebase for pdx
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:36:11PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 14.07.2023 12:27, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 05:12:09PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 07.07.2023 18:07, Alejandro Vallejo wrote: > >>> --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h > >>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h > >>> @@ -31,6 +31,17 @@ > >>> * (i.e. all devices assigned to) a guest share a single DMA address > >>> space > >>> * and, by default, Xen will ensure dfn == pfn. > >>> * > >>> + * pdx: Page InDeX > >>> + * Indices into the frame table holding the per-page's book-keeping > >>> + * metadata. A compression scheme may be used, so there's a possibly > >>> non > >>> + * identity mapping between valid(mfn) <-> valid(pdx). See the comments > >>> + * in pdx.c for an in-depth explanation of that mapping. This also has > >>> a > >>> + * knock-on effect on the directmap, as "compressed" pfns have no > >>> + * corresponding mapped frames. > >> > >> Didn't you mean to keep the directmap part optional, > > I did. > > > >> which would call for saying "may" here (twice)? > > That paragraph as-is doesn't really mandate a directmap. It merely state > > that there are knock-on effects on directmap indexing, not that there's > > always a directmap to index. > > > >> Yet then ... > >> > >> > >>> --- a/xen/include/xen/pdx.h > >>> +++ b/xen/include/xen/pdx.h > >>> @@ -1,6 +1,73 @@ > >>> #ifndef __XEN_PDX_H__ > >>> #define __XEN_PDX_H__ > >>> > >>> +/* > >>> + * PDX (Page inDeX) > >>> + * > >>> + * This file deals with optimisations pertaining to frame table and > >>> + * directmap indexing, A pdx is an index into the frame table, which > >>> + * typically also means an index into the directmap[1]. However, having > >>> an > >>> + * identity relationship between mfn and pdx could waste copious amounts > >>> of > >>> + * memory in empty frame table entries and page tables. There are some > >>> + * techniques to bring memory wastage down. > >>> + * > >>> + * [1] Some ports apply further modifications to a pdx before indexing > >>> the > >>> + * directmap. This doesn't change the fact that the same compression > >>> + * present in the frame table is also present in the directmap > >>> + * whenever said map is present. > >> > >> .. you mention it here as non-optional as well. Didn't you tell me that > >> Arm doesn't use compressed indexes into the directmap? > >> > >> Jan > > > > The [1] note states "whenever said map is present", meaning that it may not > > be present. Saying it's optional is a stretch though. It's not like we can > > choose right now. > > > >> Didn't you tell me that Arm doesn't use compressed indexes into the > >> directmap? > > arm32 doesn't have a directmap at all. arm64 uses biased pdx as indices > > (they are offset by a constant), so they are still subject to compression. > > Hmm, then our understanding of "optional" was differing: I understood > "use of compressed indexes is optional", when you apparently meant > "the use of a directmap is optional". If this is the case, then I > agree with the chosen wording. (Nevertheless using the suggested "may" > wouldn't yield and incorrect outcome.) > > Jan Like this? ``` * pdx: Page InDeX * Indices into the frame table holding the per-page's book-keeping * metadata. A compression scheme may be used, so there's a possibly non * identity mapping between valid(mfn) <-> valid(pdx). See the comments * in pdx.c for an in-depth explanation of that mapping. This also may * have a knock-on effect on the directmap, as "compressed" pfns may not * have corresponding mapped frames. ``` If so, sure. I don't mind either way. I'm happy for those 2 _may_s to be added. Thanks, Alejandro
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |