[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 03/11] x86/uaccess: move declarations to address MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > The variable declarations inside macros {put,get}_unsafe_size are > considered unreachable code, as they appear in a switch statement, before > any clause. They are moved in the enclosing scope to resolve the violation. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > index 684fccd95c..a2aaab1e87 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h > @@ -191,11 +191,12 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; }; > > #define put_unsafe_size(x, ptr, size, grd, retval, errret) \ > do { \ > + long dummy_; \ > + \ > retval = 0; \ > stac(); \ > switch ( size ) \ > { \ > - long dummy_; \ > case 1: \ > put_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "b", "b", "iq", errret); \ > break; \ > @@ -218,11 +219,12 @@ do { > \ > > #define get_unsafe_size(x, ptr, size, grd, retval, errret) \ > do { \ > + long dummy_; \ > + \ > retval = 0; \ > stac(); \ > switch ( size ) \ > { \ > - long dummy_; \ > case 1: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "b", "=q", errret); break; \ > case 2: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "w", "=r", errret); break; \ > case 4: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "k", "=r", errret); break; \ > -- > 2.34.1 >
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |