[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH v2] xen/string: add missing parameter names



On 03/08/23 21:26, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2023, Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/08/2023 12:52, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 3 Aug 2023, at 12:46, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Luca,

On 03/08/2023 11:28, Luca Fancellu wrote:
On 3 Aug 2023, at 09:26, Federico Serafini
<federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Add missing parameter names to address violation of MISRA C:2012
rule 8.2 ("Function types shall be in prototype form with named
parameters").

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
   - memset() adjusted.
---
xen/include/xen/string.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

+void *memset(void *s, int c, size_t count);
+void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count);
There is a comment in arch/arm/rm32/lib/memcpy.S with this:
/* Prototype: void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n); */
+void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t count);
There is a comment in arch/arm/rm32/lib/memmove.S with this:
   * Prototype: void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
+int memcmp(const void *cs, const void *ct, size_t count);
+void *memchr(const void *s, int c, size_t n);
+void *memchr_inv(const void *s, int c, size_t n);
@Stefano: would it make sense to remove it as part of this patch or
maybe not?

They are a verbatim copy of the Linux code. So I would rather no touch it.

Oh I see! Thank you for pointing that out, then I’m wondering if it’s there
a reason why we
are using ‘count’ instead of ’n’ as third parameter name, I know Stefano
suggested that, so
It’s just a curiosity. Maybe it’s for clarity?

I guess because the generic implementation of memset (see xen/lib/memset.c) is
using 'count' rather than 'n'.

Yep


Given what Andrew said, I would say we should rename the parameter to 'n'.

Yes, either way works. I was only trying to be consistent with
xen/lib/memset.c. It is also fine to change xen/lib/memset.c instead.

If you want to be consistent compared to the C99 Standard,
then other parameter names need to be changed, for example all the `cs`
and `ct` should become `s1` and `s2`, respectively.
The same goes for `dest` and `src`.
If you agree, I can propose a v3 that takes care of that.

--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.