[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen/ppc: Implement early serial console on PowerNV
On 8/7/23 10:05 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.08.2023 02:11, Shawn Anastasio wrote: >> Implement the OPAL firmware calls required to write to the serial >> console on PowerNV systems. Unlike pseries/Open Firmware, the OPAL >> firmware interface can be used past early boot and as such the relevant >> functions are not marked as __init. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Constraint as before and with two nits > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > >> @@ -20,8 +22,20 @@ >> * Load the address of a symbol from the TOC into the specified GPR. >> */ >> #define LOAD_REG_ADDR(reg,name) >> \ >> - addis reg,%r2,name@toc@ha; >> \ >> - addi reg,reg,name@toc@l >> + addis reg, %r2, name@toc@ha; >> \ >> + addi reg, reg, name@toc@l >> + >> +/* >> + * Declare a global assembly function with a proper TOC setup prologue >> + */ >> +#define _GLOBAL_TOC(name) >> \ >> + .balign 4; >> \ >> + .type name, @function; >> \ >> + .globl name; >> \ >> +name: >> \ >> +0: addis %r2, %r12, (.TOC.-0b)@ha; >> \ >> + addi %r2, %r2, (.TOC.-0b)@l; >> \ > > Strictly speaking the - want surrounding by blanks, but I wonder whether > to PPC eyes these constructs look more natural without. Please clarify. This is admittedly very subjective, but to my eyes the code as-is looks perfectly natural. That said, I wouldn't be opposed to adding spaces if that's what you prefer. >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/xen/arch/ppc/ppc64/opal-calls.S >> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ >> +/* >> + * Adapted from Linux's arch/powerpc/boot/opal-calls.S >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2016 IBM Corporation. >> + * Copyright Raptor Engineering, LLC >> + */ >> + >> +#include <asm/asm-defns.h> >> +#include <asm/opal-api.h> >> +#include <asm/msr.h> >> + >> + .text >> + >> +#define OPAL_CALL(name, token) \ >> + .globl name; \ >> +name: \ >> + li %r0, token; \ >> + b opal_call >> + >> + _GLOBAL_TOC(opal_call) > > Any reason for the leading blank here? No -- that was a mistake on my part. > > Where necessary I again think these small items can be taken care of > while committing. Sounds good. > Jan Thanks, Shawn
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |