[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] swiotlb: search the software IO TLB only if the device makes use of it
Petr Tesarik <petrtesarik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Skip searching the software IO TLB if a device has never used it, making > sure these devices are not affected by the introduction of multiple IO TLB > memory pools. > > Additional memory barrier is required to ensure that the new value of the > flag is visible to other CPUs after mapping a new bounce buffer. For > efficiency, the flag check should be inlined, and then the memory barrier > must be moved to is_swiotlb_buffer(). However, it can replace the existing > barrier in swiotlb_find_pool(), because all callers use is_swiotlb_buffer() > first to verify that the buffer address belongs to the software IO TLB. > > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- Excuse me if this is a silly question, but I'm not able to figure it out on my own... > include/linux/device.h | 2 ++ > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 7 ++++++- > kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 14 ++++++-------- > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > index 5fd89c9d005c..6fc808d22bfd 100644 > --- a/include/linux/device.h > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ struct device_physical_location { > * @dma_io_tlb_mem: Software IO TLB allocator. Not for driver use. > * @dma_io_tlb_pools: List of transient swiotlb memory pools. > * @dma_io_tlb_lock: Protects changes to the list of active pools. > + * @dma_uses_io_tlb: %true if device has used the software IO TLB. > * @archdata: For arch-specific additions. > * @of_node: Associated device tree node. > * @fwnode: Associated device node supplied by platform firmware. > @@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ struct device { > #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC > struct list_head dma_io_tlb_pools; > spinlock_t dma_io_tlb_lock; > + bool dma_uses_io_tlb; You add this new member here, fine... > #endif > /* arch specific additions */ > struct dev_archdata archdata; > diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > index 8371c92a0271..b4536626f8ff 100644 > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h > @@ -172,8 +172,13 @@ static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, > phys_addr_t paddr) > if (!mem) > return false; > > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC)) > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC)) { > + /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in swiotlb_find_slots() and > + * swiotlb_dyn_alloc(), which modify the RCU lists. > + */ > + smp_rmb(); > return swiotlb_find_pool(dev, paddr); > + } > return paddr >= mem->defpool.start && paddr < mem->defpool.end; > } > > diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > index adf80dec42d7..d7eac84f975b 100644 > --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c > @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ static void swiotlb_dyn_alloc(struct work_struct *work) > > add_mem_pool(mem, pool); > > - /* Pairs with smp_rmb() in swiotlb_find_pool(). */ > + /* Pairs with smp_rmb() in is_swiotlb_buffer(). */ > smp_wmb(); > } > > @@ -764,11 +764,6 @@ struct io_tlb_pool *swiotlb_find_pool(struct device > *dev, phys_addr_t paddr) > struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem; > struct io_tlb_pool *pool; > > - /* Pairs with smp_wmb() in swiotlb_find_slots() and > - * swiotlb_dyn_alloc(), which modify the RCU lists. > - */ > - smp_rmb(); > - > rcu_read_lock(); > list_for_each_entry_rcu(pool, &mem->pools, node) { > if (paddr >= pool->start && paddr < pool->end) > @@ -813,6 +808,7 @@ void swiotlb_dev_init(struct device *dev) > #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB_DYNAMIC > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->dma_io_tlb_pools); > spin_lock_init(&dev->dma_io_tlb_lock); > + dev->dma_uses_io_tlb = false; ...here you initialize it, fine... > #endif > } > > @@ -1157,9 +1153,11 @@ static int swiotlb_find_slots(struct device *dev, > phys_addr_t orig_addr, > list_add_rcu(&pool->node, &dev->dma_io_tlb_pools); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->dma_io_tlb_lock, flags); > > - /* Pairs with smp_rmb() in swiotlb_find_pool(). */ > - smp_wmb(); > found: > + dev->dma_uses_io_tlb = true; > + /* Pairs with smp_rmb() in is_swiotlb_buffer() */ > + smp_wmb(); > + ...and here you set it if swiotlb is used. But, as far as I can tell, you don't actually *use* this field anywhere. What am I missing? Thanks, jon
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |