[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moving Dom0less to common, Was: [PATCH 0/5] Fine granular configuration
- To: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:58:26 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=N/oikjZblIu2K5b55makPuKDvXK8KeamNCJisBLMO0A=; b=N6QNCHxQgnllVQWBAPK/gBG/KJpu7CLUT+1kVQXWEJRGmwR8x8N0o+ieGsnSiD4cdPi9LZ1droec4DYImXBmsR0g5Z1QLnNUiRCF8mYx7pjdu9gNYmidlSKAdUkpaMmrI0aJ8UsvrA5zBg8hVcJDG0K/RPgt4uOuwZyOOZkeg1zWI9UGOvEBgy08M0dCUWGDwVR10+DsxVxV6liN/md5hgOcsW2nHQwp2+4IMIc9J/uu/VSI3HqKSGeTFduiUmXO/E00kJuNMTmfRUCYhl4ahETNNadURsrSKNukzDNqGK7RXXa7fVdvpUgEZWw60bqsdkep+hczrpVUD+aIRb4RcQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=P+etWnIFRtdiz8/7iNY08G3owg7hIF9wtU/awVBz9veq0HlESYp4EfVxHqZm98f75F3QvacnNgIsu1v7lB3/Oz4x88tmjtJN3vfloxl5lVKa1zjggPHoqcaTpR3UUGHJX1xxhUysoPqKJDWOMb5W35DzEeSw5IES3Sa2ndLcwXj8849Cb6UlA0XXG2xu46140wZdkHYFn9G1vOB0/hNHVRF3hhNSdibBq5+qGAScxpaknmLRlqEdb/fJOBGQoqUelcltChhYge+8SCyjUb4xFi0Utxns3/jEA7Q0/UI17HdE8ppiT2yaSf0PbqUFjHSCHXtvsslMSo4m4IfmM0u7WA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>, Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, "george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx" <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, "christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx" <christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx>, "dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:58:48 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 10.08.2023 12:43, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> On 10 Aug 2023, at 10:07, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 09.08.2023 21:51, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> Would the x86 maintainers be OK with it too? Of course further changes
>>> will be needed to make it useable on x86, but looking at the series from
>>> Christopher, the two sets of internal interfaces (dom0less/ARM and
>>> hyperlaunch/x86) are very much aligned and similar already.
>>
>> Moving common code to common/ is surely okay with me. How much wants
>> moving is (apparently) a different question.
>
> Would x86 maintainers (and who is taking care of common/) be ok for the
> dom0less
> code to be part of common/ but in this first stage be protected by a
> dependency on the
> Kconfig ARM?
It's actually more than just being okay with this: I wouldn't be okay with
there not being such a guard, as then x86 binaries would carry dead code.
Jan
|
