[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH] docs/misra: add rules 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> 10.1 with several caveats, described in the notes. 10.3 and 10.4 as "aspirational" guidelines, as clarified in the notes. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxx> --- docs/misra/rules.rst | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/misra/rules.rst b/docs/misra/rules.rst index 4f33ed4ba6..2f16451703 100644 --- a/docs/misra/rules.rst +++ b/docs/misra/rules.rst @@ -318,6 +318,58 @@ maintainers if you want to suggest a change. - An element of an object shall not be initialized more than once - + * - `Rule 10.1 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_10_01.c>`_ + - Required + - Operands shall not be of an inappropriate essential type + - The following are allowed: + - Value-preserving conversions of integer constants + - Bitwise and, or, xor, one's complement, bitwise and assignment, + bitwise or assignment, bitwise xor assignment (bitwise and, or, xor + are safe on non-negative integers; also Xen assumes two's complement + representation) + - Left shift, right shift, left shift assignment, right shift + assignment (see C-language-toolchain.rst for assumptions on + compilers' extensions) + - Implicit conversions to boolean for logical operators' arguments + + * - `Rule 10.2 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_10_02.c>`_ + - Required + - Expressions of essentially character type shall not be used + inappropriately in addition and subtraction operations + - + + * - `Rule 10.3 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_10_03.c>`_ + - Required + - The value of an expression shall not be assigned to an object + with a narrower essential type or of a dierent essential type + category + - Please beware that this rule has many violations in the Xen + codebase today, and its adoption is aspirational. However, when + submitting new patches please try to decrease the number of + violations when possible. + + gcc has a helpful warning that can help you spot and remove + violations of this kind: conversion. For instance, you can use + it as follows: + + cd xen; CFLAGS="-Wconversion -Wno-error=sign-conversion -Wno-error=conversion" make + + * - `Rule 10.4 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_10_04.c>`_ + - Required + - Both operands of an operator in which the usual arithmetic + conversions are performed shall have the same essential type + category + - Please beware that this rule has many violations in the Xen + codebase today, and its adoption is aspirational. However, when + submitting new patches please try to decrease the number of + violations when possible. + + gcc has a helpful warning that can help you spot and remove + violations of this kind: arith-conversion. For instance, you + can use it as follows: + + cd xen; CFLAGS="-Warith-conversion -Wno-error=arith-conversion" make + * - `Rule 12.5 <https://gitlab.com/MISRA/MISRA-C/MISRA-C-2012/Example-Suite/-/blob/master/R_12_05.c>`_ - Mandatory - The sizeof operator shall not have an operand which is a function -- 2.25.1
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |