[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] x86: Fix calculation of %dr6/7 reserved bits
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 10:21:39 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=VnuDmbIkkF2oI029vh8HoXx5en3tqGvFAc1SXTtzHt0=; b=i9/vP+7snolsX9mLa6MtaQEnrmgdT5bHv+ZEQXlT7IaYMnPj5YQh9sOBfeYy6QmjY8VtOmLRdz+9IIqNy/CoVCL7M6KTAlP6HPSaZ1VLpEP/lM/D21Uitxal74fx1Y86136bpZUok7c+Q2Od/TYRdVhyCAgKqYpE9JR93NihUb/DK4O8Vl0hbe+QV7s6nvKdJok2sNtcGtjdvaigXOjgDguXRv0NljdY2gQlJ+JX/Lrj42TQ1lfI4rRv2s8sky2bc7hk16WhZSy9Y/NMm5ZsGkiRg7itTxZvAXhRh3hU88JrsHZ3EOjfz2V3LY6tHhPiOn5GuTzcBpdh9WpAqFYk5g==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WypPvYJwsC85WVnksT2fJ4gqorFrrT6DD7gg0IXORX10LGucPmq8ZWWZYNclTvxhAuSfswb4TDauR+pR7unX3C1bBHv3boYKma9yyBELEAjjvl2rL2GQvrRu+4ZtZRmZok37mZ6KU55Er5vkZTXdH7h4bgwLIGUWYBGDDwniUuyGlt4OyMlnmGLvpB3Qg99NlUaaySYnZP1LAN4MeYzSR5igIQRjDysl8NiimzH6mPz+ktd4dMTlxo3L8fpOgPdlAL3StXimYK3P+4SpHKSPqhUsHPc0WtGJDut91JJyksRD908hGqBmh5lYYodhto2eORPYz7HWUAW/dQAcQ9LeSg==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jinoh Kang <jinoh.kang.kr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 08:21:54 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24.08.2023 18:37, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/08/2023 4:25 pm, Jinoh Kang wrote:
>> - Define X86_DR{6,7}_* constants in x86-defns.h instead of open-coding
>> naked numbers (thanks Jan)
>
> Jan - stop insisting of other people things I've already rejected,
> particularly on my patches.
Quoting from my reply to Jinoh: "There was one aspect Andrew didn't like,
so leaving that part as is would be fine." I can't see how one can call
this "insist". Beyond that it's clearly his decision whether to agree
with your or my view (and just to be clear, I'm okay with your
justification of why you prefer to use bare numbers).
Jan
|
