[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN][PATCH v10 02/20] common/device_tree.c: unflatten_device_tree() propagate errors
- To: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 09:09:30 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=aK+YL4CKzVdJthe1y/GBq5XHJer5rui3mMA+WDmay1Y=; b=Sw+bA6VhBL8wYzgbNXOdmXO5A+ilX39EoMn0yUR9/kmpFEM75nuTlLFzC6l0wHLOSIBv+e5NYVUIp2Mc0khYBgDzHQo31V87/5X7DxQXgkeEP7t4iIWwIydMsEtFO2Jbu9dSYMrA3C7I+JFM4wfgnDRBq+oYuApO0tQFtnF6TZT+tdzzVfqe/Ngw+QWMKh+RXzjnyzTVckkKMlT6Jhp43qPecSk0rZ5lTX4btBaKocnkXWySQN/eWP1wNW0ZfOLtDOmRgLpPi9X5JIP6fiJcifTGiYHWAvEx10+XyKe/O/zes5dDDhllZguF16dMzIWFBnChknDQxwr+CA96OgwFUg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=cKy7J/3Dx4KPg1kGrBAvedJWdA9Z103afBswxAUU5umk7z8o/qVFzy4IP/zJxqvUBp3HiyWrJnD6kOeQW8B70v2bSxRVt/gY6970s0PDM9KlUsgvkBJ2qPj7FDvEpdtPZjXP+LoD0NgLQ25ETjPlM54drwB5Xeca4J5UYAq6G6eSB7F2C2tIQKCyLNqNicnyHkvlVyNZeU+YUjcvrOmSt9rWzYOjK1mbht6tlwstXFmYRX1fveQ+QnZwyTuPANhRpEYdOoesDhr9Er/kFQQL0BIq5y9h8cVO/WQk9XtBdhHY+iBZyeAYMDIjBFIbFmKCfHHWPI1PPJzSZCfEAzq7CQ==
- Cc: <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, <julien@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:09:50 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 25/08/2023 10:02, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> This will be useful in dynamic node programming when new dt nodes are
> unflattend
> during runtime. Invalid device tree node related errors should be propagated
> back to the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
~Michal
|
